Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2006.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Framework for IT Governance and the Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…overlap each other). Yet, addressing both practitioner viewpoint we also fulfilled wha Kivijarvi [47] argue to be a good practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…overlap each other). Yet, addressing both practitioner viewpoint we also fulfilled wha Kivijarvi [47] argue to be a good practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Even though the concept of ITG did not feature in literature until the late 1990s (Brown & Grant, 2005), it is an important issue on the agenda of many organisations (Simonsson, Johnson, & Wijkstrom, 2007). Effective ITG is seen as a vital way to ensure improved organisational performance (Dahlberg & Kivijarvi, 2006) and is considered as a key enabler as well as the single most important predictor of the value an organisation generates from IT . ITG, which is an integral part of corporate governance, has become a focal point in every business (Willson & Pollard, 2009).…”
Section: It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative models to establish IT governance have been proposed and compared [6,10]. Some emphasize organizational structures [32], some emphasize IT governance processes [20] while other focus on both [19].…”
Section: Cooperation and It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%