An integrated framework for bridge infrastructure resilience analysis against seismic hazard

Khan, Saiful Arif; Kabir, Golam; Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir; Dutta, Subhrajit

doi:10.1080/23789689.2022.2126624

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, MCDM methods have been used to evaluate the sustainability performance of different modes of transportation, such as cars [97], buses [98], trains [99], and airplanes [100], and to identify the most sustainable options for a given transportation problem. These methods can also be applied to support the design and planning of transportation infrastructure, such as roads [101], bridges [102], and airports [103], considering criteria such as energy consumption, environmental impacts, and social and economic benefits, and even assess potential suppliers based on their ability to address specific challenges such as the COVID-19 epidemic [104]. Furthermore, MCDM methodologies are also proposed to monitor customer satisfaction in the airline service industry, aiming to enhance service quality and meet consumer expectations [105].…”

Section: Case Studies: Applications Of Mcdm Methods In Sustainable En...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods with Sustainable Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices

Štilić¹,

Puška²

2023

Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have gained increased attention in sustainable engineering, where complex decision-making problems require consideration of multiple criteria and stakeholder perspectives. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the different MCDM methods, their applications in sustainable engineering, and their strengths and weaknesses. The paper discusses the concept of sustainable engineering, its principles, and the different areas where MCDM methods have been applied, including energy, manufacturing, transportation, and environmental engineering. Case studies of real-world applications are presented and analyzed, highlighting the main findings and implications for engineering practice. Finally, the challenges and limitations of MCDM methods in sustainable engineering are discussed, and future research directions are proposed. This review contributes to the understanding of the role of MCDM methods in sustainable engineering and provides guidance for researchers and practitioners.

show abstract

Section: Case Studies: Applications Of Mcdm Methods In Sustainable En...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods with Sustainable Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices

Štilić¹,

Puška²

2023

Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Design phase: This is the first stage of the bridge's life and is usually the cause of collapse if the design is inappropriate or insufficient (Peng et al, 2020). Bridge reliability mainly depends on design (Khan et al, 2022). Bridges in Algeria were built at different periods without considering seismic effects in their design.…”

Section: Identification Of Preference Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bridge importance: Román et al (2022) and Khan et al (2022) identified the importance factor as one of the most important factors affecting bridge seismic resilience (Khan et al, 2022;Román et al, 2022b). The RPOA (2008) classifies bridges into three groups: strategic, important, and moderately important based on their role and traffic flow.…”

Section: Identification Of Preference Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritizing Bridges for Seismic Resilience Enhancement: A Case Study of Algeria

Abdellaoui,

Badaoui,

Bensaibi

et al. 2024

J. Eng. Exact Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Algeria is located in an active seismic zone, making its bridges vulnerable to damage, especially older ones. Due to the importance of bridges in terms of safety, social, and economic factors, competent authorities must prepare for disasters, particularly earthquakes, by enhancing bridge resilience. However, due to the large number of bridges and lack of funding, it is not feasible to improve all bridges at once. This article proposes a model to determine priorities for enhancing bridge resilience to earthquakes based on expert opinions in three main steps. Step 1: Identification of key criteria, where design phase, bridge health, seismic zone, bridge importance, availability of alternative roads, and disaster insurance are defined as key criteria. Step 2: Calculation of criteria weights using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and integration of expert opinions using the Euclidean distance-based aggregation method (EDBAM). Step 3: Calculation of the priority index after evaluating criteria categories. The model was applied to six bridges, and their ranking was established based on the priority index. The model has proven its accuracy and ability to assist decision-makers in identifying priority bridges.

show abstract

“…MCDA is designed to manage decisional processes characterised by multiple dimensions. MCDA methods, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Aziz et al, 2022;Mukesh et al, 2022;Chavoshy et al, 2018;Morshed et al, 2020), Analytic Network Process (ANP) , the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Tang et al, 2022b;Zhang and Ng, 2021), Principal Components Analysis (PCA) (Mohammed et al, 2022), Best-Worst method (Khan et al, 2022;Khan et al, 2023), Structural Equation Model (Zhang et al, 2022b), and Grey Relational analysis (Hu et al, 2020) are used to evaluate and rank the critical influential factors of system resilience. The fuzzy logic analysis is often used to convert qualitative descriptions of these factors into quantitative evaluation for assessing the performance of the factors (Jiao et al;Lad et al, 2022;Tang et al, 2022b) and the entropy weight method is adopted to allocate weights to the factors (Jiao et al;Li et al, 2022;Zhang and Ng, 2021).…”

Section: Mcda-based Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Old Wine in New Bottles? Understanding Infrastructure Resilience: Foundations, Assessment, and Limitations

Bi,

MacAskill,

Schooling

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An integrated framework for bridge infrastructure resilience analysis against seismic hazard

Cited by 8 publications

References 49 publications

Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods with Sustainable Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices

Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods with Sustainable Engineering: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices

Prioritizing Bridges for Seismic Resilience Enhancement: A Case Study of Algeria

Old Wine in New Bottles? Understanding Infrastructure Resilience: Foundations, Assessment, and Limitations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About