Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual Conference Frontiers in Education
DOI: 10.1109/fie.1992.683461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated first-year curriculum in science, engineering, and mathematics: Porgress, pitfalls, and promise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One year, we were in the chemistry laboratory of our Integrated First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (Winkel & Froyd, 1992), having just finished studying gas laws and the actions of gasses in liquids, and so we thought we would simply ask the students for this lab to: Define fizz and conduct an experiment to measure fizz by your definition. We had in mind something akin to what we were actually doing in the chemistry laboratory.…”
Section: Defining Fizzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One year, we were in the chemistry laboratory of our Integrated First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (Winkel & Froyd, 1992), having just finished studying gas laws and the actions of gasses in liquids, and so we thought we would simply ask the students for this lab to: Define fizz and conduct an experiment to measure fizz by your definition. We had in mind something akin to what we were actually doing in the chemistry laboratory.…”
Section: Defining Fizzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1993-1994 the FC consciously focused its attention on the development of a freshman year that utilizes the FC thrusts. All institutions began with the Rose-Hulman model, 6 which existed prior to the FC, and adapted it for their campus at the same time. Likewise, when campuses focused on the development of a sophomore year, FC faculty across the Coalition used the pre-Coalition Texas A&M model 7 and, simultaneously, adapted it for their campus.…”
Section: Lower-division Curriculamentioning
confidence: 99%