2001
DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2001.10854899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Decision Tree Approach (IDTA) to Mapping Landcover Using Satellite Remote Sensing in Support of Grizzly Bear Habitat Analysis in the Alberta Yellowhead Ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach to producing a land cover map of the Foothills Model Forest was based on a decision-tree classifier, a unique combination of unsupervised and supervised classification techniques that rely on spectral, digital elevation model, and polygonal GIS data to extract the maximum information content from the assembled mapping database (Franklin et al 2001b). For personal use only.…”
Section: Mapping Land Cover In the Foothills Model Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach to producing a land cover map of the Foothills Model Forest was based on a decision-tree classifier, a unique combination of unsupervised and supervised classification techniques that rely on spectral, digital elevation model, and polygonal GIS data to extract the maximum information content from the assembled mapping database (Franklin et al 2001b). For personal use only.…”
Section: Mapping Land Cover In the Foothills Model Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Fundy Model Forest, the objective was to report the area of change in forest structure in each year for which suitable Landsat image data were available over a 15-year time period (1984-1999) (Franklin et al 2001a). In the Foothills Model Forest, validated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) habitat maps were required (Franklin et al 2001b). The objective was to generate a Landsat TM land cover map that could provide a suitable input layer for models of bear habitat use and population dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will support the standardization because it makes possible cross-comparable data: at spatial and temporal levels. In regard to habitat identification through RS recent researches have suggested different relevant considerations and requirements: study areas specific approaches; ecological expert knowledge implemented as decision rules; the implementation/inclusion of key input variables selected following specific characteristics of individual habitats; the integration of ancillary data into the classification processes, related to shape, texture, context; the use of non-parametric algorithms implemented through binary classifications or decision trees that allow to include nominal, derived and ancillary geospatial data and also are advantageous with scarce training samples; (Bock et al 2005;Boyd et al 2006;Foody et al 2007;Franklin et al 2001;Kerr and Ostrovsky 2003;Martínez et al 2010;Mücher et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies have focused on the mapping of one specific thematic class (Boyd et al 2006;Foody et al 2007) hypothesizing that non-parametric algorithm would be more suitable to habitats of conservation interest because of the scarce spatial distribution usually associated to them (the size of the training sample will be smaller). Other studies have combined that kind of techniques (binary classifications by DT) in hybrid approaches (Franklin et al 2001). The hybrid approaches assumes that parametric algorithms like standard maximum likelihood (ML) are the best option with spectrally different habitats while applies non-parametric algorithms to other complex habitats, in a so-called Integrated Decision Tree Approach (IDTA).…”
Section: The Use Of Binary Classifications By Decision Trees (Dt) (Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation