2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated constructed wetland to treat contaminants and nutrients from dairy farmyard dirty water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although full documentation of the effectiveness of the constructed wetlands based on several years monitoring has not been done, Kjaergaard and Hoffmann (2010) indicate that constructed wetlands have a higher nitrogen removal per acreage compared to natural wetlands. The efficiency of the constructed wetlands is however dependent on local conditions such as design and size of the wetland, size of the drainage catchment, soil type, nutrient loadings, hydrological conditions, season, biological activities, and management (Dunne et al 2005;Kadlec et al 2000;Scholz and Lee 2005;Woltemade 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although full documentation of the effectiveness of the constructed wetlands based on several years monitoring has not been done, Kjaergaard and Hoffmann (2010) indicate that constructed wetlands have a higher nitrogen removal per acreage compared to natural wetlands. The efficiency of the constructed wetlands is however dependent on local conditions such as design and size of the wetland, size of the drainage catchment, soil type, nutrient loadings, hydrological conditions, season, biological activities, and management (Dunne et al 2005;Kadlec et al 2000;Scholz and Lee 2005;Woltemade 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The constructed wetland systems are seen as potential low-cost and effective measures for improvement of water quality in recipient water bodies and have been employed extensively in countries such as the USA, Norway, Sweden, Italy, New Zealand, and the UK. (Dunne et al 2005;Scholz et al 2007;Schoumans et al 2014;Smith et al 2006;Tanner et al 2005;Wood et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Typical nitrogen removal mechanisms known to involve in FWS CW and affected by pH, dissolved oxygen (DO) and water temperature include ammonification, denitrification, and nitrification while sorption, precipitation and plant uptake are the major phosphorus removal processes (Vymazal, 2007). CW performance may vary with site location, wastewater characteristics, wetland design and application (Dunne et al, 2005). Also, behavior of nutrients along the flow path varies in every wetland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being an ecological wastewater treatment technology, constructed wetland (CW) was very practical with the low cost and easy management [7]. Its high removal rates for nitrogen and phosphorus were assumed to make up for the shortcoming of MBR [8,9]. Hence, the combined technology of MBR and CW, which was applied to treat the high concentration wastewater, may be a good try.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%