2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated chemical mass balance and source emission inventory model for the source apportionment of PM2.5 in typical coastal areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Source apportionment that quantifies the contribution of sources to air pollutants is the basis for formulating air pollution control strategies and includes two methods of receptor models and air quality models 21 . Receptor models such as chemical mass balance (CMB) 22 , 23 and positive matrix factorization (PMF) 23 – 25 can estimate the relationship between receptors and sources on the basis of measurements. Numerous studies have been conducted to quantify the contribution of emission sources to PM in Chinese cities, especially over the regions of the PRD, YRD and BTH 26 – 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source apportionment that quantifies the contribution of sources to air pollutants is the basis for formulating air pollution control strategies and includes two methods of receptor models and air quality models 21 . Receptor models such as chemical mass balance (CMB) 22 , 23 and positive matrix factorization (PMF) 23 – 25 can estimate the relationship between receptors and sources on the basis of measurements. Numerous studies have been conducted to quantify the contribution of emission sources to PM in Chinese cities, especially over the regions of the PRD, YRD and BTH 26 – 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the State Council requires governments at all levels to promote the action of withdrawing from the city and entering the park , resulting in enhanced production concentration within these parks alongside intensified pollutant emissions [ [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] ]. The atmospheric condition in industrial parks is different with that in relatively low polluted areas, due to the characterization of small-scale, dense enterprises and various chemical and complex production processes [ [12] , [13] , [14] ], as well as the intermittent and fugitive emissions of VOCs [ 15 , 16 ] and the inevitable emissions of NO X [ 17 , 18 ], resulting in more complex in O 3 formation rules [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superposition of exogenous sources was most significant for soil pollution. Exogenous sources of HMs included mining, industrial sources (such as the metal smelting plants, thermal power plants and alkylation plants) [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], agricultural sources (fertilizers, pesticides and livestock manure) [ 18 , 19 ] and traffic sources (wear of metal parts and exhaust emission) [ 20 ]. In addition, the soil of the karst area, compared to that of non-karst area, is characterized by thin regoliths, uneven distribution, and high porosity [ 21 , 22 ], which contributed to the migration of HMs from the surface to the subsoil and even contaminated underground water [ 9 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, numerous methods were utilized in source apportionment of HMs in soils. For instance, correlation analysis and cluster analysis were widely used to qualitatively define these sources [ 30 , 31 ], whereas receptor models, such as principle component analysis (PCA), chemical mass balance (CMB), positive matrix factorization (PMF), UNMIX and absolute principal component analysis followed by multiple linear regression (APCA-MLR), were widely applied to quantitatively analyze the contribution of each source [ 14 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Among the mentioned methods, the CMB model, directly analyzing numerical values rather than deviations, had a better-fitting accuracy based on building of the source profile, which improved confidence in the robustness of source apportionment results [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%