2016 IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation (CEFC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cefc.2016.7816427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated characterization model for the magnetic design of an EV charger's circular wireless power transfer pads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupling could be improved in this design compared with a single ferrite bar. Hariri et al [93] present a circular pad design that takes the effect of the magnetic core and the conductive shielding layers. Moreover, they proposed the Pareto optimality algorithm to maximise the coupling factor and the quality factor for the coils of the dynamic wireless EVs charging system.…”
Section: Wireless Ev Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling could be improved in this design compared with a single ferrite bar. Hariri et al [93] present a circular pad design that takes the effect of the magnetic core and the conductive shielding layers. Moreover, they proposed the Pareto optimality algorithm to maximise the coupling factor and the quality factor for the coils of the dynamic wireless EVs charging system.…”
Section: Wireless Ev Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous works endeavored to maximize the coupling coefficient [3]. Some tried to strike a balance among multiple objectives [4][5][6]. For most IPT systems, the latter, i.e., multiobjective optimization of the coil assemblies, is of more practical value as a practical IPT system is usually subject to various constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both analytical methods and numerical methods, e.g., finite element analysis (FEA) [3][4] and the finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD) [7][8], are useful tools for performance evaluation. The former is based on simplifications and usually restricted to certain types of systems [5]. By contrast, the latter is universally applicable and highly accurate provided that precise parameters are assigned to the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%