2006
DOI: 10.1175/waf924.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Approach to Mid- and Upper-Level Turbulence Forecasting

Abstract: An automated procedure for forecasting mid- and upper-level turbulence that affects aircraft is described. This procedure, termed the Graphical Turbulence Guidance system, uses output from numerical weather prediction model forecasts to derive many turbulence diagnostics that are combined as a weighted sum with the relative weights computed to give best agreement with the most recent available turbulence observations (i.e., pilot reports of turbulence or PIREPs). This procedure minimizes forecast errors due to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
270
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
270
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of kinetic energy from subgrid scale models require knowledge of the Richardson number and the length scales of mixing and dissipation (Schumann, 1991), see Appendix A9, which is uncertain for NWP grids with grid scales far outside the inertial range. Turbulence experienced by cruising aircraft (including but not restricted to clear air turbulence) can be estimated from coarse NWP fields (Sharman et al, 2005;Frehlich and Sharman, 2010) but the scaling of this turbulence (composed of waves and turbulence) to plume scales has still to be investigated.…”
Section: The Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of kinetic energy from subgrid scale models require knowledge of the Richardson number and the length scales of mixing and dissipation (Schumann, 1991), see Appendix A9, which is uncertain for NWP grids with grid scales far outside the inertial range. Turbulence experienced by cruising aircraft (including but not restricted to clear air turbulence) can be estimated from coarse NWP fields (Sharman et al, 2005;Frehlich and Sharman, 2010) but the scaling of this turbulence (composed of waves and turbulence) to plume scales has still to be investigated.…”
Section: The Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NCAR-developed clear-air turbulence forecast product, graphical turbulence guidance (GTG), is currently in operational use by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Aviation Weather Center. In accordance with plans for the FAA's Next Generation Air Transportation System, additional capabilities for GTG are under development to enhance its ability to nowcast convectively-induced turbulence (CIT), that is, turbulence in and around storms, using data sources such as radar, satellite and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models (Sharman et al 2006;Williams et al 2008). In this section, we specifically focus on developing improved prediction of CIT.…”
Section: Understanding Convectively Induced Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of now most operationally used forecasting techniques infer clear-air turbulence (CAT) behaviour from larger scales resolved in the NWP models (e.g. Sharman et al, 2006;Gill and Buchanan, 2014). This methodology is based on widely accepted assumption that due to the turbulent energy cascade the presence (Wyngaard, 2010) of resolved scale turbulence is implying the presence of sub-scale turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology is based on widely accepted assumption that due to the turbulent energy cascade the presence (Wyngaard, 2010) of resolved scale turbulence is implying the presence of sub-scale turbulence. However, NWP-based forecast is bound to generate errors and requires sophisticated statistical corrections (Williams, 2014;Sharman et al, 2006;Kim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%