An integrated approach for modelling and quantifying housing infrastructure resilience against flood hazard

Sen, M. K.; Dutta, Subhrajit; Kabir, Golam; Pujari, Nikil N.; Laskar, Shamim Ahmed

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125526

Cited by 30 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The recovery time and recovery path depend on the kind of infrastructure system and the availability of resources. The failure and recovery paths are uncertain [10]. Cimellaro et al [11] also distinguished reliability and recovery as the two essential components of resilience.…”

Section: Hazards Consequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The repair cost depends on two attributes, financial resource to repai or replace the pipe and degree of damage [28]. Speed of repair depends on four attribute which are, degree of damage, resource availability (non-availability of pipe material dur ing and after the disaster increase the delay time in the recovery process [10,25]), ap proachability towards the resource (approachability disturbance slowdowns the recovery procedure [10,25]), and structural monitoring (monitoring the stormwater pipe infrastruc ture regularly can give the pipe conditions and assist in diagnosing problems quickly afte incidents, making the recovery process faster [29,30]). On the other hand, recovery is connected with two main factors which are repair cost and speed of repair.…”

Section: Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience's Hierarchical Model De...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Earthquake Resilience Framework for a Stormwater Pipe Infrastructure System Integrating the Best Worst Method and Dempster–Shafer Theory

Garshasbi

Kabir

2022

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stormwater pipe infrastructure is a fundamental requirement of any nation, but pipes can be damaged in natural disasters. Consequently, evaluating the resilience of stormwater infrastructure to earthquake damage is an essential duty for any city because it outlines the capability to recover from a disaster after the event. The resilience quantification process needs various data types from various sources, and uncertainty and partial data may be included. This study recommends a resilience assessment framework for stormwater pipe infrastructure facing earthquake hazards using Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning (HER) on the basis of the Dempster–Shafer (D-S) theory. The developed framework was implemented in the City of Regina, SK, Canada to quantify the resilience of the stormwater pipe infrastructure. First, various resilience factors were identified from the literature. Based on experts’ judgment, the weight of these factors was determined using the Best Worst Method (BWM). After that, the resilience was determined using the D–S theory. Finally, sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the sensitivity of the factors of the recommended hierarchical stormwater infrastructure resilience model. The recommended earthquake resilience assessment model produced satisfying outcomes, which showed the condition state of resilience with the degree of uncertainty.

show abstract

Section: Hazards Consequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience's Hierarchical Model De...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Earthquake Resilience Framework for a Stormwater Pipe Infrastructure System Integrating the Best Worst Method and Dempster–Shafer Theory

Garshasbi

Kabir

2022

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently some scholars have made attempts to explain relationships of resilience assessment indicators with interpretive structural model. Sen et al (2021) developed a hierarchical flood resilience model for housing infrastructure. The relationships among various resilience parameters related to flood hazards are obtained using integrated decisionmaking trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and the interpretive structure modeling (ISM) methods.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently some scholars have made attempts to explain relationships of resilience assessment indicators with interpretive structural model. Sen et al. (2021) developed a hierarchical flood resilience model for housing infrastructure.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring relationships of urban seismic resilience assessment indicators with a fuzzy total interpretive structural model method

Zhao

Yang

Zhai

et al. 2022

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate relationships of urban seismic resilience assessment indicators.Design/methodology/approachTo achieve this aim, construction of the urban seismic resilience assessment indicators system was conducted and 20 indicators covering five dimensions, namely building and lifeline infrastructure, environment, society, economy and institution were identified. Following this, this study used evidence fusion theory and intuitionistic fuzzy sets to process the information from experts then developed the fuzzy total interpretive structure model.FindingsA total of 20 urban seismic resilience assessment indicators are reconstructed into a hierarchical and visual system structure including five levels. Indicators in the bottom level including debris flow risk, landslide risk, earthquake experience and demographic characteristics are fundamental indicators that significantly impact other indicators. Indicators in the top level including open space, gas system and public security are direct indicators influenced more by other indicators. Other indicators are in middle levels. Results of MICMAC analysis visually categorize these indicators into independent indicators, linkage indicators, autonomous indicators and dependent indicators according to driving power and dependence.Originality/valueThis paper attempts to explore relationships of urban seismic resilience assessment indicators with the interpretive structural model method. Additionally, Fuzzy total interpretive structure model is developed combined with evidence fusion theory and intuitionistic fuzzy sets, which is the extension of total interpretive structure model. Research results can assist the analytic network process method in assessing urban seismic resilience in future research.

show abstract

“…(1) During the operation period, the operation cost shall be fully considered [16][17][18][19]. If it is necessary to participate in the operation activity for construction enterprise of overseas transportation infrastructure, the operation cost shall be fully considered referring to the domestic project demonstration, and the correction calculation shall be carried out on the basis of integrating the operation cost of domestic projects and referring to the local development level, so as to ensure the smooth operation of the project.…”

Section: Project Operation Periodmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Development Risk of Overseas Transportation Infrastructure under the New Form Based on Interpretive Structure Model

Chen

et al. 2021

Advances in Civil Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the improvement of China’s comprehensive national strength, more and more construction enterprises began to undertake overseas construction projects. Under the premise of the epidemic situation and the increasingly severe international situation, it is of great significance to study the risk control of overseas transportation infrastructure construction. This paper constructs the risk influencing factor model of overseas transportation infrastructure development risk in the new form from six aspects, that is, decision-making risk, design and planning risk, construction risk, operation risk, government risk, and force majeure, and uses the interpretative structure model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The key factors affecting the risk of overseas transportation foundation design and development are studied, and the adaptive solutions are put forward.

show abstract

An integrated approach for modelling and quantifying housing infrastructure resilience against flood hazard

Cited by 30 publications

References 49 publications

Earthquake Resilience Framework for a Stormwater Pipe Infrastructure System Integrating the Best Worst Method and Dempster–Shafer Theory

Earthquake Resilience Framework for a Stormwater Pipe Infrastructure System Integrating the Best Worst Method and Dempster–Shafer Theory

Exploring relationships of urban seismic resilience assessment indicators with a fuzzy total interpretive structural model method

Study on Development Risk of Overseas Transportation Infrastructure under the New Form Based on Interpretive Structure Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About