2016
DOI: 10.1080/10652469.2016.1247837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integral representation for the product of parabolic cylinder functions

Abstract: This paper uses the convolution theorem of the Laplace transform to derive an inverse Laplace transform for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions in which the orders as well as the arguments differ. This result subsequently is used to obtain an integral representation for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions D ν (x)D μ (y). The integrand in the latter representation contains the Gaussian hypergeometric function or alternatively can be expressed in terms of the associated Legendre function … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restrictions on x and y in both expressions are identical but the representations differ considerably in terms of the condition for convergence for the orders, namely Re(ν + μ) < 1 in [7] versus Re(ν) < 0 in Equation (3.1). This property of integral representation (3.1) has interesting consequences as will be noted below.…”
Section: Integral Representations Of (Products Of) Parabolic Cylindermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The restrictions on x and y in both expressions are identical but the representations differ considerably in terms of the condition for convergence for the orders, namely Re(ν + μ) < 1 in [7] versus Re(ν) < 0 in Equation (3.1). This property of integral representation (3.1) has interesting consequences as will be noted below.…”
Section: Integral Representations Of (Products Of) Parabolic Cylindermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that the integrand in the integral representation (3.1) contains the parabolic cylinder function, whereas the representation for D ν (x)D μ (y) in Equation (3.1) in [7] was expressed in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric function or the associated Legendre function of the first kind. The restrictions on x and y in both expressions are identical but the representations differ considerably in terms of the condition for convergence for the orders, namely Re(ν + μ) < 1 in [7] versus Re(ν) < 0 in Equation (3.1).…”
Section: Integral Representations Of (Products Of) Parabolic Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plugging the transform (27) into the latter expression and simplifying the result via the linear transformation formula (24) gives (28).…”
Section: Inverse Laplace Transforms For Products Of Parabolic Cylinde...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These allow the results of Ditlevsen [11] to be derived. Another useful result, related to the idea of analytic continuation, is the reflection formula, analogous to that of the Gamma function and derived in the same way, but not nearly as well-known, to the extent that it appears to be a new result (see Appendix) despite integral representations of products of parabolic cylinder functions remaining of interest in the special functions community [35,51,52]:…”
Section: Comment On the Ou Casementioning
confidence: 99%