The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10688-010-0041-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integer-valued version of the Birman—Krein formula

Abstract: Abstract. We discuss an identity in abstract scattering theory which can be interpreted as an integer-valued version of the Birman-Krein formula.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Krein spectral shift functions are widely used in scattering theory, see [21][22][23][27][28][29]. For a pair of selfadjoint operators H 0 , H on a Hilbert space H, the spectral shift function ξ(λ) is defined by the Lifshits trace formula…”
Section: Spectral Shift Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Krein spectral shift functions are widely used in scattering theory, see [21][22][23][27][28][29]. For a pair of selfadjoint operators H 0 , H on a Hilbert space H, the spectral shift function ξ(λ) is defined by the Lifshits trace formula…”
Section: Spectral Shift Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we want to make a connection to (22) and (23), we are obliged to suppose that f is a Laplace transform but eventually of a distribution since, typically, we want to allow f (x) to be e −x .…”
Section: Calculation Of the Spectral Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.7] (see also [3,), but also this definition fixes ξ( · ; A + , A − ) only up to an integer as will be discussed in some detail in Appendix A. For additional discussions addressing the open integer in ξ( · ; A + , A − ) we refer to [28]. ✸ Next, we apply Theorem A.1 to the pair (A + , A − ), identifying A 0 with A − , A with A + , and B with the operator of multiplication by φ, assuming again Hypothesis 3.1.…”
Section: The Strategy Employed and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8.7] (see also [3,), but also this definition fixes ξ( • ; A + , A − ) only up to an integer as will be discussed in some detail in Appendix A. For additional discussions addressing the open integer in ξ( • ; A + , A − ) we refer to [28]. ✸…”
Section: The Strategy Employed and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%