2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integer Programming Formulation of the Minimum Common String Partition Problem

Abstract: We consider the problem of finding a minimum common string partition (MCSP) of two strings, which is an NP-hard problem. The MCSP problem is closely related to genome comparison and rearrangement, an important field in Computational Biology. In this paper, we map the MCSP problem into a graph applying a prior technique and using this graph, we develop an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation for the problem. We implement the ILP formulation and compare the results with the state-of-the-art algorithms fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blum et al (2015) present the first integer linear programming (ILP) model for this problem, as well as an ILP-based heuristic. More efficient ILP models have been later proposed by Blum and Raidl (2016) and Ferdous and Rahman (2015). A list of recent articles on the MCSP problem is shown in Table 11.…”
Section: Unbalanced Minimum Common String Partition Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blum et al (2015) present the first integer linear programming (ILP) model for this problem, as well as an ILP-based heuristic. More efficient ILP models have been later proposed by Blum and Raidl (2016) and Ferdous and Rahman (2015). A list of recent articles on the MCSP problem is shown in Table 11.…”
Section: Unbalanced Minimum Common String Partition Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, both original and modified models are applied to a wide range of problem instances. Note that the third existing ILP model from Ferdous and Sohel Rahman () is not considered here because a corresponding modification is not as straightforward as for the other two models.…”
Section: Modification Of the Ilp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), together with a deterministic 2‐phase heuristic based on the ILP model. Later on, improved ILP models were presented in Ferdous and Sohel Rahman () and Blum and Raidl (). The current state‐of‐the‐art technique is a construct, merge, solve, and adapt (CMSA) approach from Blum et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%