2017
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2016.2635022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Instrumental Quality Measure for Artificially Bandwidth-Extended Speech Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [9], [11] and [19], the performance of the PESQ-DNN and baseline models is measured by the mean absolute error (MAE)…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following [9], [11] and [19], the performance of the PESQ-DNN and baseline models is measured by the mean absolute error (MAE)…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, data-driven approaches have attracted much attention in approximating highly non-linear functions even for estimating human perception. Abel et al trained a supportvector-machine-based MOS predictor to intrusively predict subjective MOS scores for narrowband-to-wideband artificial speech bandwidth extension [9]. The development of deep neural networks (DNNs) pushes the performance even further and enables end-to-end training of speech quality DNNs to predict instrumental metrics or subjective listening test results even in a non-intrusive way, without the need for a reference signal [10]- [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To instrumentally evaluate the enhanced speech ŝ(n), the mean logarithmic spectral distance (LSD) averaged over frames is employed [61]. The LSD is calculated as…”
Section: E Metrics Of Speech Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding instrumental speech quality assessment, measures such as NB-PESQ [62], WB-PESQ [63], POLQA [64], or QABE [65] cannot be used for the presented LB-ABE approach, since these measures have not been developed for LB-ABE approaches. Still for information, Tab.…”
Section: A Instrumental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%