1935
DOI: 10.1785/bssa0250010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale*

Abstract: Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,011 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For less than 40 events (N r = 37), the depth was initially calculated to be greater than 50 km. The majority of earthquakes (N r = 1.010) that occurred within this period had a depth between 5 and 20 km, which is in good agreement with the results of other works [50,51]. In Figure 5, we can observe the distribution of the magnitude of earthquakes as a function of depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For less than 40 events (N r = 37), the depth was initially calculated to be greater than 50 km. The majority of earthquakes (N r = 1.010) that occurred within this period had a depth between 5 and 20 km, which is in good agreement with the results of other works [50,51]. In Figure 5, we can observe the distribution of the magnitude of earthquakes as a function of depth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In order to calculate accurate local magnitudes (M L ) for the catalog we first convolved the seismograms for each earthquake with the Wood-Anderson standard response (Anderson & Wood, 1925;Richter, 1935) and measured the peak-to-trough displacement amplitude on the vertical component. We then use these measurements to directly invert for a local-magnitude scale following the method of Keir et al (2006) and Illsley-Kemp et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different types of neural networks, convolutional networks have recently gained popularity for seismological applications because of their ability for automatic feature extraction and scaling to long input vectors, which are usually the case for earthquake signals; however, their sensitivity to unnormalized input data, makes their application for magnitude estimation challenging. The local magnitude scale (Richter, 1935),M L , has the following form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnitude provides the public with quick information on earthquakes and is used in scientific research as well. Since Charles F. Richter introduced the earthquake magnitude scale, the so called local (M L ) or Richter scale, in 1935 (Richter, 1935), there have been many studies proposing various types of magnitude scales. These magnitude scales measure different properties of the seismic waves (e.g., low-frequency energy vs. high-frequency energy, surface waves vs. body waves) and although they may represent fundamentally different characteristics of the source, they are suitable for different earthquake sizes and different epicentral distance ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%