2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01204.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes it hard to show that democracy is necessary for human rights, even when we suppose that it is necessary for justice. (Cohen 2006;Christiano 2011;Gilabert 2012;Miller forthcoming). It would therefore be surprising if epistemic differences between democratic and undemocratic government tell decisively in favour of the former, and against the best of the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it hard to show that democracy is necessary for human rights, even when we suppose that it is necessary for justice. (Cohen 2006;Christiano 2011;Gilabert 2012;Miller forthcoming). It would therefore be surprising if epistemic differences between democratic and undemocratic government tell decisively in favour of the former, and against the best of the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the view defended by Henry Shue in Basic Rights (1996). Thomas Christiano (2011) and David Reidy (2012) defend similar views. I will call this the "Unity View."…”
Section: Three Accounts Of the Relationship Between Political Particimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lever arguments claim that political participation is the tool that the members of some society use to secure their human rights. Christiano's (2011) argument for a human right to democracy is, in part, a lever argument. A second argument is the "reciprocity" argument.…”
Section: The Unity Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrumental argument, more fully developed in Christiano (2011), is based on the empirical claim that democracies better protect a range of human rights than non-democracies. There are some questions about this argument (Lister 2012;Reidy 2012).…”
Section: Justice Legitimacy and The Human Right To Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%