Bureaucracy: Three Paradigms 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1396-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Institutionalist Theory of Bureaucracy: Organizations and Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on the institutionalist "Veblen-Ayres dichotomy" on the distinction between technology and ceremony (De Gregori & Thompson, 1993), I propose the metaphor of bureaucracy as the infrastructure for transporting money. This differs from discussions in Marxist analysis, where an owner dominates in the process of setting an agenda, while bureaucracy has to serve its customer (Djilas, 1975;Mandel, 1992).…”
Section: Bureaucracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Building on the institutionalist "Veblen-Ayres dichotomy" on the distinction between technology and ceremony (De Gregori & Thompson, 1993), I propose the metaphor of bureaucracy as the infrastructure for transporting money. This differs from discussions in Marxist analysis, where an owner dominates in the process of setting an agenda, while bureaucracy has to serve its customer (Djilas, 1975;Mandel, 1992).…”
Section: Bureaucracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With attention to the "Veblen-Ayres" dichotomy, the framing of bureaucracy suggests a technological institute in its means, but a ceremonial one in its ends (De Gregori & Thompson, 1993). Essentially, bureaucracy shapes and controls the system of money redistribution by imposing ordinances and regulations for the market economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%