2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, scholars seek to identify both the nature of social outcomes and indicators of high performance within those outcomes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Possible social outcomes include, for example, subjective satisfaction (Kroeger & Weber, 2014); societal progress (Gundry et al, 2011); enhanced human experience (Zahra & Wright, 2016); the preservation of cultural and natural environments (Peredo & Chrisman, 2006); the alleviation of suffering after disasters (Dutta, 2017;Williams & Shepherd, 2016b; reduced poverty (Peredo & Chrisman, 2006); crowdfunding success (Parhankangas & Renko, 2017;Josefy et al, 2016;Calic & Mossakowski, 2016); food, water, shelter, and education (Certo & Miller, 2008); microloan organizations' performance (Wry & Zhao, 2018;Zhao & Lounsbury, 2016); "faith, hope, comfort and salvation" (Pearce et al, 2010); the empowerment of women (Datta & Gailey, 2012;; and both poverty reduction and conflict resolution in Rwanda's entrepreneurial coffee sector (Tobias et al, 2013). In contrast to these specific descriptions of social outcomes, other studies (typically c...…”
Section: Successful Organizational Outcomes and The Degree Of Hybriditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, scholars seek to identify both the nature of social outcomes and indicators of high performance within those outcomes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Possible social outcomes include, for example, subjective satisfaction (Kroeger & Weber, 2014); societal progress (Gundry et al, 2011); enhanced human experience (Zahra & Wright, 2016); the preservation of cultural and natural environments (Peredo & Chrisman, 2006); the alleviation of suffering after disasters (Dutta, 2017;Williams & Shepherd, 2016b; reduced poverty (Peredo & Chrisman, 2006); crowdfunding success (Parhankangas & Renko, 2017;Josefy et al, 2016;Calic & Mossakowski, 2016); food, water, shelter, and education (Certo & Miller, 2008); microloan organizations' performance (Wry & Zhao, 2018;Zhao & Lounsbury, 2016); "faith, hope, comfort and salvation" (Pearce et al, 2010); the empowerment of women (Datta & Gailey, 2012;; and both poverty reduction and conflict resolution in Rwanda's entrepreneurial coffee sector (Tobias et al, 2013). In contrast to these specific descriptions of social outcomes, other studies (typically c...…”
Section: Successful Organizational Outcomes and The Degree Of Hybriditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This viable stream of studies has developed the concept of organizational field [61][62][63][64][65] to indicate an organization's relational space, which is populated not only by classical market forces (like in the traditional concept of industrial sector), but also, and even more importantly, by rules, values, beliefs and social expectation, which are clustered into consistent systems called institutional logics [66,67]. In particular, the studies on institutional/social entrepreneurship [68][69][70][71][72] are providing in-depth analyses on the complexity and importance of institutional dynamics in continuously (re)building sustainability-oriented actions. The first, pioneering studies are exploring how self-organizing networks of motivated actors can trigger long-term processes of sustainability transformations at the level of the organizational field [20].…”
Section: Different Trajectories Of Csr: Façade Solutions or Sustainabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant research also ignores the 'social' element of much entrepreneurship (e.g. Anggadwita et al, 2017;Ashraf et al, 2019;Rivera-Santos et al, 2015;Zahra and Wright, 2016;Zhao and Lounsbury, 2016), self-employment, community entrepreneurship and microenterprise within developing countries. That is not surprising, given that the very characterization of NE and OE is itself often inconsistent.…”
Section: Theorizing Entrepreneurship and Small Business Ownership: Dementioning
confidence: 99%