An insight into morphometric descriptors of cell shape that pertain to regenerative medicine

Abstract

Cellular morphology has recently been indicated as a powerful indicator of cellular function. The analysis of cell shape has evolved from rudimentary forms of microscopic visual inspection to more advanced methodologies that utilize high-resolution microscopy coupled with sophisticated computer hardware and software for data analysis. Despite this progress, there is still a lack of standardization in quantification of morphometric parameters. In addition, uncertainty remains as to which methodologies and parameters of cell morphology will yield meaningful data, which methods should be utilized to categorize cell shape, and the extent of reliability of measurements and the interpretation of the resulting analysis. A large range of descriptors has been employed to objectively assess the cellular morphology in two-dimensional and three-dimensional domains. Intuitively, simple and applicable morphometric descriptors are preferable and standardized protocols for cell shape analysis can be achieved with the help of computerized tools. In this review, cellular morphology is discussed as a descriptor of cellular function and the current morphometric parameters that are used quantitatively in two- and three-dimensional environments are described. Furthermore, the current problems associated with these morphometric measurements are addressed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Smart biomaterials: Surfaces functionalized with proteolytically stable osteoblast-adhesive peptides

“…For image analysis, single randomly chosen cells were contoured and shape parameters (area, perimeter, circularity, and convexity) were obtained using NIH Image J software [38] .…”

Multivariate discriminant analysis for branching classification of colonic tubular adenoma glands

“…The well-known Kudo's pit-pattern classification is the result of combing endoscopic findings with histologic findings of glandular crypts (Kudo, Hirota, Nakajima, et al, 1994). New techniques and parameters are continually defining and redefining morphological categories (Lobo, See, Biggs, & Pandit, 2016). Complex branching shapes can be better classified with the help of new parameters such as the chord intersection ratio, convexity ratio, and maximum concave area ratio.…”

Bioimage Analysis and Cell Motility

“…The choice of descriptors can be purely heuristic (that is, by observing the cells), or educated with the help of data analysis techniques such as dimensionality reduction algorithms (e.g., NMF, principal component analysis [PCA], t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding [t-SNE], or uniform manifold approximation and projection [UMAP]), which simplify visualization on the basis of statistical or topological principles. 102 , 103 An extensive list of descriptors is available, 104 , 105 starting from very simple features (e.g., area, elongation) and covering a broad range of applications; for example, the ramification factor and branching points are adapted to approximately count filopodia and neuron dendrites, whereas principal axes have been used to quantify the relative orientation of dividing neuroblasts 106 and growing bacteria. 107 …”