2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5918-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now?

Abstract: The iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) technique is widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. Here, we review the iTRAQ literature; in particular, we focus on iTRAQ usage in relation to other commonly used quantitative techniques e.g. stable isotope labelling in culture (SILAC), label-free methods and selected reaction monitoring (SRM). As a result, we identify several issues arising with respect to iTRAQ. Perhaps frustratingly, iTRAQ's attractiveness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
201
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
3
201
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Label-free quantification is an increasingly popular alternative to isotopic tagging quantitative methods; it does not require labeling reagents and can be applied to an unlimited number of samples (Neilson et al, 2011;Evans et al, 2012). This is particularly appealing within plant proteomics, because the most conventional labeling strategy, Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, is not easily suited for quantitative plant proteomic studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label-free quantification is an increasingly popular alternative to isotopic tagging quantitative methods; it does not require labeling reagents and can be applied to an unlimited number of samples (Neilson et al, 2011;Evans et al, 2012). This is particularly appealing within plant proteomics, because the most conventional labeling strategy, Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, is not easily suited for quantitative plant proteomic studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gel free quantification methods achieve protein identification and relative quantification using MS with significant advantages over 2DE [10]. Protein and peptide labeling methods, metabolic (eg SILAC) or T'AQ -methods are increasingly gaining in popularity [11,12]. To date, no direct comparison of all these techniques has been reported ( Table 1).…”
Section: Approaches In Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows the simultaneous analysis of four to eight distinct samples, depending on the reagents used (250). The interested reader may refer to (251) for an updated review of iTRAQ methods and applications. All these isotope labeling methodologies have been successfully employed in the quantification of PTMs, for example, in the characterization of grapevine response to infection by simultaneous monitoring protein phosphorylation, acetylation and glycosylation (252).…”
Section: C) Quantification Strategies For Ptms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%