2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An insight into instrumental variable frequency-domain subspace identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithm 3.1 was proposed in [7] and under mild noise and frequency assumptions [7], [25], it is consistent, that is, Σ c converges to A in its Jordan form w.p.1 as N → ∞.…”
Section: ) Putã Into the Following Jordan Canonical Formmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Algorithm 3.1 was proposed in [7] and under mild noise and frequency assumptions [7], [25], it is consistent, that is, Σ c converges to A in its Jordan form w.p.1 as N → ∞.…”
Section: ) Putã Into the Following Jordan Canonical Formmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subspace-based system identification methods have proven to be efficient for the identification of linear time-invariant systems (LTI), fitting a linear model to input/output or output only measurements taken from a system. An overview of subspace methods can be found in Benveniste and Fuchs (1985); Viberg (1995); Van Overschee and De Moor (1996); Benveniste and Mevel (2007); Akçay (2010). A broad range of applications exists in the identification of processes in automatic control, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the system identification problem of MIMO fractional order systems with timedelay in state is studied. A frequency-domain identification algorithm is presented, which combines genetic algorithm and the traditional subspace method [14][15][16]. The genetic algorithm is utilized to identify fractional differential order and time-delay parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3: Calculate the fitness value according to (14) for each p i , and choose the optimal individuals p o and 0 0 0 0 ( , , , )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%