An innovative pay-for-performance (P4P) strategy for improving malaria management in rural Kenya: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundIn high-resource settings, ‘pay-for-performance’ (P4P) programs have generated interest as a potential mechanism to improve health service delivery and accountability. However, there has been little or no experimental evidence to guide the development or assess the effectiveness of P4P incentive programs in developing countries. In the developing world, P4P programs are likely to rely, at least initially, on external funding from donors. Under these circumstances, the sustainability of such programs is in doubt and needs assessment.Methods/designWe describe a cluster-randomized controlled trial underway in 18 health centers in western Kenya that is testing an innovative incentive strategy to improve management of an epidemiologically and economically important problem—diagnosis and treatment of malaria. The incentive scheme in this trial promotes adherence to Ministry of Health guidelines for laboratory confirmation of malaria before treatment, a priority area for the Ministry of Health. There are three important innovations that are unique to this study among those from other resource-constrained settings: the behavior being incentivized is quality of care rather than volume of service delivery; the incentives are applied at the facility-level rather than the individual level, thus benefiting facility infrastructure and performance overall; and the incentives are designed to be budget-neutral if effective.DiscussionLinking appropriate case management for malaria to financial incentives has the potential to improve patient care and reduce wastage of expensive antimalarials. In our study facilities, on average only 25% of reported malaria cases were confirmed by laboratory diagnosis prior to the intervention, and the total treatment courses of antimalarials dispensed did not correspond to the number of cases reported. This study will demonstrate whether facility rather than individual incentives are compelling enough to improve case management, and whether these incentives lead to offsetting cost-savings as a result of reduced drug consumption.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number NCT01809873

High Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Microscopy in Rural Health Facilities in Western Kenya Under an External Quality Assurance Program

“…A full description of the study activities can be found in Menya and others. 7 The EQA program consisted of four components: 1) re-reading of positive and negative smears collected from the facility for calculation of sensitivity and specificity, 2) feedback on the quality of slide preparation along with suggested corrective measures, 3) preparation of monthly performance reports for each facility indicating the sensitivity and specificity of their laboratory malaria diagnosis and 4) on-the-job mentorship of laboratory staff including rereading of all discrepant slides.…”

Using pay for performance incentives (P4P) to improve management of suspected malaria fevers in rural Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial

“…Assignment was performed in an open forum with attendees from each clinic and district and a representative from the Division of Malaria Control. Randomization was done by blinded draw where each facility within a district had an equal probability of allocation to either arm [ 28 ].…”

Efektivitas Penerapan Pay-for-Performance Pada Asuransi Kesehatan Di Negara-Negara Asia: Literature Review

“…Ada (Peabody et al, 2011). kesehatan (Menya et al, 2013). Pemberian insentif ini juga berdasarkan zero-sum dimana yang berkinerja tinggi diberi penghargaan dan yang berkinerja rendah diberi penalti (Rosenau, Lal, & Lako, 2012).…”