“… Participants in the simulation group rated training as “highly thought of,” and were more likely to recommend the teaching to a colleague versus those in the standard group A hybrid of lectures and simulation more effective for teaching OHNS emergency management than traditional lecture-based training | Scott et al (2016)[ 90 ] | Western University, CAN | Cross-sectional study, one-day camp | Realism and utility a novel high-fidelity PTA simulator | Nearly 95% of participants were in strong agreement that objectives were met, and faculty members were effective for teaching 81% of participants agreed that the models were realistic and high quality 95% of OHNS faculty agreed the novel PTA simulator was representative of real life |
Chin et al (2016)[ 16 ] | Western University, CAN | Cross-sectional study, one-day camp | “How to guide.” Confidence performing routine OHNS emergency procedures, communication, teamwork, and stress handling skills before and after camp | Before camp participants had the most experience and confidence in intubation and bag mask ventilation and were least confident in managing retro-orbital hematomas After camp, there was a statistically significant increase in trainee confidence in 6 of the 10 procedures and confidence for triaging OHNS calls |
Smith et al (2016)[ 92 ] | University of Cambridge, UK | Cross-sectional study, one-day camp Focused lectures, practical skills training, emergency scenario simulation, and small group sessions | Feasibility of course for junior OHNS residents Knowledge of OHNS emergencies and perception of educational experience before and after camp | Statistically significant improvement on MCQ exam post-course 100% of trainees scored the boot camp as “highly thought of”. 84% of trainees would strongly recommend course 100% of trainees reported improvement in confidence performing OHNS exams and dealing with OHNS emergencies |
Kiffel et al (2017)[ 89 ] | Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, USA | Prospective cohort study, four-week curriculum 24 sessions divided into three categories: simulation, technical skills development, and didactic teaching | No outcomes were assessed | No results or conclusions were reported |
Swords et al (2017)[ 93 ] | Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK | Cross-sectional study, one-day camp Prospective, single-blinded design ... |
…”