2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative navigation scheme of powered descent phase for Mars pinpoint landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of the surface beacon is assumed as (3,396,000m, 877,800m, 177,700m) and its velocity is assumed to zero in the Mars inertial frame. The initial position of orbiting beacon is optimally preselected based on the observability analysis (Qin et al, 2014).The Mars gravity acceleration is assumed to be a constant .The altitude error of the MCAV is 0.5m, and the velocity errors are all 0.03m/s. For the radio range measurement, the range errors are 50m.…”
Section: Measurement Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The position of the surface beacon is assumed as (3,396,000m, 877,800m, 177,700m) and its velocity is assumed to zero in the Mars inertial frame. The initial position of orbiting beacon is optimally preselected based on the observability analysis (Qin et al, 2014).The Mars gravity acceleration is assumed to be a constant .The altitude error of the MCAV is 0.5m, and the velocity errors are all 0.03m/s. For the radio range measurement, the range errors are 50m.…”
Section: Measurement Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al proposed a Miniature Coherent Altimeter and Velocimeter (MCAV) and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) integrated navigation scheme for the powered descent phase to correct the inertial bias and drift by augmenting them into the state vector (Li et al, 2010). Qin et al adopted the measurement information of the integrated Doppler radar and the distance and velocity information between the Mars obiter and the vehicle to correct the vehicle horizontal position (Qin et al, 2014). Some other inertial navigation schemes based on the Doppler radar, the onboard light detection and ranging or the vision-aided optical sensors are tested to improve the performance of the spacecraft during the powered descent phase and to support the NASA's autonomous pinpoint landing project (Janschek et al, 2006;Busnardo et al, 2011;Amzajerdian et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Safe and soft pinpoint landing (within 100 m at from the target site [ 1 ]) on an extraterrestrial body has been a central objective since the beginning of human space exploration missions. To date, many manned and unmanned landers have successfully landed on moons (Apollo and Chang’E), planets (Curiosity and Opportunity) and asteroids (Rosetta and Hayabusa-2), with landing footprints in the scale of kilometers [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the errors of the traditional autonomous navigation method, inertial navigation, are of the order of a few kilometres as the navigation errors are always accumulating and the initial errors are hard to correct (Braun and Manning, 2007). It is hard for inertial navigation systems to meet the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) precise landing requirement that the landing errors are less than 100 m (Qin et al, 2014; Wolf et al, 2004). In 2014, NASA tested the Lander Vision System on the new Mars Lander (Johnson and Golombek, 2012), Mars 2020 Lander Vision System Tested (2016) showed that visual navigation based on feature matching is feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%