2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0511-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative fast track solution for food bolus impaction due to Jackhammer esophagus in an emergency department: the “Nitro-Push Blind Technique” case report

Abstract: BackgroundIn the medical literature are described only few clinical cases of esophageal food bolus impaction due to esophageal motility disorders. Moreover, the management of this condition is highly variable with no evidence in the literature to strongly support a clear defined intervention.Case presentationIn this paper we describe for the first time a case of 53-year-old male with food bolus impaction due to Jackhammer esophagus referred to emergency department. On the basis of the known esophageal past med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,5,6 There are multiple treatment methods for esophageal food impaction, including ingestion of carbonated beverages, medications that affect esophageal motility (glucagon and nitrates most commonly), and endoscopic or surgical removal of the food bolus. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Spontaneous resolution has been reported in up to 25% of food impaction patients. Medications have been effective in nearly 40% and endoscopy in more than 95% of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,5,6 There are multiple treatment methods for esophageal food impaction, including ingestion of carbonated beverages, medications that affect esophageal motility (glucagon and nitrates most commonly), and endoscopic or surgical removal of the food bolus. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Spontaneous resolution has been reported in up to 25% of food impaction patients. Medications have been effective in nearly 40% and endoscopy in more than 95% of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of non-endoscopic medications and interventions are described in the current medical literature; however, all of these alternatives are associated with limited or conflicting studies on their use [4] , [5] . Examples include: butyl scopolamine [6] , [7] , glucagon [8] , [9] , benzodiazepines [10] , calcium channel blockers [11] , nitrates [12] , [13] , meat tenderizers (which has been firmly discredited and the only treatment known to cause harm) [14] , and effervescent drinks (e.g. cola) [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%