2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03455-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative cell-laden α-TCP/collagen scaffold fabricated using a two-step printing process for potential application in regenerating hard tissues

Abstract: Cell-laden scaffolds are widely investigated in tissue engineering because they can provide homogenous cell distribution after long culture periods, and deposit multiple types of cells into a designed region. However, producing a bioceramic 3D cell-laden scaffold is difficult because of the low processability of cell-loaded bioceramics. Therefore, designing a 3D bioceramic cell-laden scaffold is important for ceramic-based tissue regeneration. Here, we propose a new strategy to fabricate an alpha-tricalcium-ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,16,25,26] Recently, the possibility to fabricate low-temperature self-setting inks that do not require the sintering step has been proposed, using formulations based on beta-calcium silicate (-CaSiO 3 ), [20,27] magnesium phosphates [28] or calcium phosphates. [29,30] Most calcium phosphate self-setting inks are based on alpha-tricalcium phosphate (-TCP), which can be combined with different binders, like gelatine, [29] type I collagen [31] hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), [32] Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) and short-chain triglycerides (Miglyol 812), [30,33,34] polyvinyl alcohol [33] and alginic acid. [33] The hardening process of these inks is due to the hydrolysis of -TCP to a calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA), resulting in nano/micro structured crystals that are much closer to the mineral phase of bone than sintered CaPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,16,25,26] Recently, the possibility to fabricate low-temperature self-setting inks that do not require the sintering step has been proposed, using formulations based on beta-calcium silicate (-CaSiO 3 ), [20,27] magnesium phosphates [28] or calcium phosphates. [29,30] Most calcium phosphate self-setting inks are based on alpha-tricalcium phosphate (-TCP), which can be combined with different binders, like gelatine, [29] type I collagen [31] hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), [32] Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) and short-chain triglycerides (Miglyol 812), [30,33,34] polyvinyl alcohol [33] and alginic acid. [33] The hardening process of these inks is due to the hydrolysis of -TCP to a calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA), resulting in nano/micro structured crystals that are much closer to the mineral phase of bone than sintered CaPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al . [ 29 ] have introduced bioceramic-based cell-printing technique and a cell-laden ceramic structure. Using 3D bioprinting technology, they created a cell-laden scaffold using α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) type I collagen and MC3T3-E1 cells.…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Applications Of Collagen- Based Bioinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jariwala, Lewis, Bushman, Adair, & Donahue, ; Müller, Becher, Schnabelrauch, & Zenobi‐Wong, ; Yang et al, ) Inclusion of bioactive composites/ceramic particles in bioinks as osteopromotive elements (silica, borate, calcium, and phosphate) is another way to promote osteogenesis. These particles (from nanosized to microsized range) act either as nucleation centres for facilitating HA deposition on constructs or by releasing ions that induced stem cell differentiation, a process commonly termed as osteoinduction (Deng et al, ; Gao et al, ; Kim, Yun, & Kim, ; Sithole et al, ; Wenz, Borchers, Tovar, & Kluger, ; Zhai et al, ). Graphene is another material gaining momentum in bone regenerative studies (Hermenean et al, ; Lee et al, ; Lu et al, ; Shadjou & Hasanzadeh, ; Shin et al, ); however, its applicability to 3D bioprinted constructs is not fully explored yet (Wang et al, ; Sayyar, Officer, & Wallace, ; Zhou et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%