An Innovative Approach to the Design of a National Probability Sample of Sexual Minority Adults

Abstract

Purpose: Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people to recruit a national probability sample is challenging for many reasons, including the low base rate of LGB people in the population. To address this challenge, researchers have relied on diverse approaches to sampling LGB people. We aimed to test an innovative method to assemble a U.S. national probability sample of non-transgender sexual minority adults. Methods: Our approach used two phases. In Phase 1, we identified LGBT respondents in a probability general population sample. These respondents were then queried about their sexual orientation and gender identity using short screening questions to identify non-transgender sexual minority respondents. In Phase 2, the identified sexual minority respondents completed the targeted survey online or on a mailed questionnaire. Results: In Phase 1, using random-digit dialing, a nationally representative sample of 366,644 respondents were screened in a brief telephone interview. Of them, 3.5% (n = 12,837) identified as LGB or transgender. In Phase 2, eligible respondents were asked to participate in a self-administered survey questionnaire. Eligibility was based on gender identity, age, race and ethnicity, and educational restrictions. Of the 3525 who were eligible, 81% (n = 2840) agreed to participate in the study (78% agreed to use the web version and 22% the mailed questionnaire), and 49% of web surveys and 46% of mailed surveys were completed. The final sample included 1331 respondents. Conclusion: The benefits of this approach include the ability to assess sexual minority-specific content in a national probability sample; challenges include high cost and low base rates for Asian and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals in the United States. *We use the generic term sexual minority to refer to people who are not heterosexual, including lesbian women, gay men, and bisexual (LGB) individuals, and those who identify by other terms, such as queer. We use the term LGBT community to refer to the community as a whole when not specifying a particular subgroup, such as LGB or transgender people.

Minority stress, distress, and suicide attempts in three cohorts of sexual minority adults: A U.S. probability sample

“…In the first phase, utilizing a question asked of all Gallup respondents in the Daily Tracking Survey (see Measures), all LGBT individuals were identified. In the second phase, respondents who identified as LGBT were assessed for eligibility for participation in the Generations study, and those eligible were invited to participate in the survey [ 44 ].…”

Health Disparities of Older Adults in California: The Role of Sexual Identity and Latinx Ethnicity

“…Typically, studies of sexual minorities do not include representative samples and when they do, they do not include sufficient numbers of sexual minorities to allow intersectional analysis (Meyer et al, 2020). The California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) is a large state survey allowing assessment of health disparities at the intersection of sexual identity and Latinx ethnicity.…”

Longitudinal trends in PrEP familiarity, attitudes, use and discontinuation among a national probability sample of gay and bisexual men, 2016–2018

“…The current study examined data from male participants in the Generations Study, which used a national probability sample of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults in three age cohorts recruited from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The study methods are described in detail elsewhere [23]. Three distinct age cohorts (ages 18-25, 34-41, and 52-59 at screening) were targeted that represent different historical periods which contextualized the experience of LGB adults in the U.S.…”