2012
DOI: 10.1093/teamat/hrs008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative approach to evaluating the University of Limerick's Mathematics Learning Centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread provision of mathematics support across HEIs in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Australia has been welldocumented in recent years (Perkin et al 2012;Gill et al 2008;MacGillivray 2008). Best practice guides are available for establishing mathematics support centres (Mac an Bhaird et al 2012) and numerous papers have explored the effectiveness of such support services for students who engage with mathematics support, using a variety of approaches such as analysis of usage data (Croft 2000;Ní Fhloinn 2009;MacGillivray 2009), internal student questionnaires and focus groups (Parsons et al 2011;Carroll and Gill 2012;Grehan et al 2016), evidence from external sources such as the UK National Student Survey (results of which are available at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/), and measures of the potential impact of mathematics support upon retention and performance (Pell and Croft 2008;Mac an Bhaird et al 2009;Gill and O'Donoghue 2006) with overwhelmingly positive results overall. For a detailed review of these and other such research, see Matthews et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread provision of mathematics support across HEIs in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Australia has been welldocumented in recent years (Perkin et al 2012;Gill et al 2008;MacGillivray 2008). Best practice guides are available for establishing mathematics support centres (Mac an Bhaird et al 2012) and numerous papers have explored the effectiveness of such support services for students who engage with mathematics support, using a variety of approaches such as analysis of usage data (Croft 2000;Ní Fhloinn 2009;MacGillivray 2009), internal student questionnaires and focus groups (Parsons et al 2011;Carroll and Gill 2012;Grehan et al 2016), evidence from external sources such as the UK National Student Survey (results of which are available at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/), and measures of the potential impact of mathematics support upon retention and performance (Pell and Croft 2008;Mac an Bhaird et al 2009;Gill and O'Donoghue 2006) with overwhelmingly positive results overall. For a detailed review of these and other such research, see Matthews et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Awofala's ( 2016) study discloses that there was no significant difference by gender, selfconfidence, enjoyment, motivation, and value of mathematics. Carroll and Gill (2012) findings indicated that most female students of the University of Limerick in Ireland who participated in the study had considerable positive attitudes towards geometry than their male counterparts in the study. On the contrary some studies emphasized that males showed more positive attitudes towards geometry than females (Michelli, 2013;Tasdemir, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, students also value highly being able to use the centre at times which are convenient for them rather than at times which are determined for them. ' Carroll and Gill [26] report similar reasons for student engagement but also found that their mathematics learning centre was having a positive impact with students 'because it helped them to gain a greater understanding of mathematics', with a number commenting that the tutors in the centre 'helped them achieve greater understanding than the lecturers'.…”
Section: Lawson Croft and Halpinmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Carroll and Gill [26] report that the students visiting their centre greatly value knowing when support is available and the convenience of being able to drop in at times that suit them. Respondents here reported similar benefits noting particularly the extensive and consistent availability of support:…”
Section: Convenient and Timelymentioning
confidence: 99%