1990
DOI: 10.1016/0260-6917(90)90006-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovation in a diploma program: the future potential of mentorship in nursing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is recognized in other studies of mentoring. Wright (1990), for example, found that factor analysis of student nurse responses to an evaluation of their experience of mentoring produced four factors, two of which, socialization into the work role and professional role acquisition, ®t well with the community of practice interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is recognized in other studies of mentoring. Wright (1990), for example, found that factor analysis of student nurse responses to an evaluation of their experience of mentoring produced four factors, two of which, socialization into the work role and professional role acquisition, ®t well with the community of practice interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tbe relahonship between the mstructor and nursmg staff on the umt was found to make a difference in tbe manner m which students were accepted on the umt Tbe facilitative mstructor worked with botb staff emd students to create a positive leaming environment This would concur with Wnght's (1990) observahons that the quahty of the student-mentor and staff-mentor relahonship was an important determinant of effechve leaming Although instructors were an invaluable resource for student leammg, students were frequently reluctant to ask them questions as tbey did not want to appear ignorant Therefore, peer group support became cntical at this tune In an earlier study, Simpson (1979) found that students sought peer support withm the nurses' residence In tbe imiversity setting this opportunity was not available but students used their clinical group, wrtuch remained constant over the year, to share their concems and to provide support While students were highly compehhve m the classroom, they collaborated in the clmical settmg, assishng each otber by shanng their knowledge and in developing their tecbmcal skills It was miportant for them to know that their ovwi fears and emxiehes were shared by their peers There was evidence that the students became a hgbtknit, family group serving as a supporhve network for one another This helped relieve tension and decreased anxiety, thus facilitating their abihty to leam…”
Section: Instructor's Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The factors which influence how students leam m the cial to student learmng Effechve chmcal teachers have chmcal settmg is knowledge which is cnhcal for nurse-been found to be good role models, who enjoy teachmg educators The findings reported m this study are part of and demonstrate clmical skill and sound judgement It has a major study on student sociahzahon into nursmg As far also been noted that the efiFechve chmcal lnstmctor demback as 1968, Olesen & Whittaker found that students had onstrates canng behaviours toward the students m the a significant effect on the sociahzahon of their peers The leammg environment (Beck 1991) These behaviours are infiuence of role models, both practismg nurses (Olesen & Another factor which has been found to affect students' IE Campbelleial abihty to leam is the structure of the climcal environment Tbe quahty of tbe relationship between the student and clinical mentor (Wnght 1990), and the mentor's knowledge, athtude and commumcahon skills are also cntical to student leaming (Bailhe 1993) While students seek out role models, their image ofthe 'good nurse' is built through personal observation of divergent prachce and reconciliation of conflictmg philosophies (Wilson & Startup 1991) However, the student nurse's own role-enactment is constantly subject to modification and adaptation because educahon takes place m an ever-changmg social setting wbere pahents/clients receive care (Olsson & Gullberg 1987) Melia (1987) noted that students had difficulty differentiating between their role of learner and worker The students are thrust into the clinical area as short-term members of the patient care team, thus their position is anomalous and the motive for involvement m patient care is usually different from tbat of permanent employees (Ashworth & Morrison 1989) The findings reported m this paper are part of a major study on student socialization Initially, the overall study IS described This is followed by the presentation and discussion of the findings relating to the students' descnptions of factors which facilitated their leaming to nurse in the clinical setting…”
Section: Introduction ^Gg^ Nehnng 1990) Has Over Hme Been Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Morle 1990, Anforth 1992). Wright (1990), following an evaluative study of the experiences of ®nal year students claimed the importance of preparation for the role of mentor. That successful mentoring depends on appropriate preparation of both mentors and students where the mentors are experienced practitioners, was a key feature of this study.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main strength of Wright's (1990) evaluative study was its multi-method approach of triangulation, which considered the views of both students and their mentors, although the primary focus was on the views of the mentors rather than the students. The work was restricted because of the narrow review of available literature, considering the date of publication and the smallness of the sample size.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%