2006
DOI: 10.1007/11922162_110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Initial Study on Progressive Filtering Based on Dynamic Programming for Query-by-Singing/Humming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies in QbSH can also be categorized into top-down and bottom-up methods [2][3][4] [5]. The bottom-up approach solves the matching problems in QbSH by locally comparing the humming/singing query data with the reference music data to find the optimal matching result [6][7] [9]. Alternatively, the top-down method uses the global shape of the two waveforms for comparison, and the local information of the waveform for the adjustment of the matching result of global shape matching [2][8] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies in QbSH can also be categorized into top-down and bottom-up methods [2][3][4] [5]. The bottom-up approach solves the matching problems in QbSH by locally comparing the humming/singing query data with the reference music data to find the optimal matching result [6][7] [9]. Alternatively, the top-down method uses the global shape of the two waveforms for comparison, and the local information of the waveform for the adjustment of the matching result of global shape matching [2][8] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QbSH systems based on a dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm are one of the most common approaches. In the QbSH system proposed by Jang et al [9] [12], DTW was used to calculate the distance between the pitch features extracted from the queries and the reference data. An extension of DTW with three dimensions was proposed by Heo et al in order to solve the problem with multiple pitch candidates [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%