2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/2392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An INFRARED NEBULA ASSOCIATED WITH Δ CEPHEI: EVIDENCE OF MASS LOSS?

Abstract: We present the discovery of an infrared nebula around the Cepheid prototype δ Cephei and its hot companion HD 213307. Large scale (∼ 2.1 · 10 4 AU) nebulosity is detected at 5.8, 8.0, 24 and 70 µm. Surrounding the two stars, the 5.8 and 8.0 µm emission is largely attributable to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) emission swept from the ISM by a wind originating from δ Cephei and/or its companion. Stochastically heated small dust grains are the most likely source of the 24 and 70 µm extended emission. The 7… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(84 reference statements)
7
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neilson et al (2010) found that angular diameters measured using the IRSB techniques may be overestimated because of circumstellar media that cause an infrared (IR) excess. This IR excess is presumably caused by mass-loss activity, evidence for which has been found recently on δ Cephei (Marengo et al 2010;Matthews et al 2012). In particular, the K-band flux excess for δ Cephei is 1.5% (Mérand et al 2006), which translates into a difference of ΔK = 0.016 mag.…”
Section: Angular Diameters For δ Cepheimentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Neilson et al (2010) found that angular diameters measured using the IRSB techniques may be overestimated because of circumstellar media that cause an infrared (IR) excess. This IR excess is presumably caused by mass-loss activity, evidence for which has been found recently on δ Cephei (Marengo et al 2010;Matthews et al 2012). In particular, the K-band flux excess for δ Cephei is 1.5% (Mérand et al 2006), which translates into a difference of ΔK = 0.016 mag.…”
Section: Angular Diameters For δ Cepheimentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Instead, the position of RS Pup in the nebula appears essentially coincidental, thus providing a natural explanation to the scarcity of similar Cepheid-nebula associations. Although bow shocks have been observed by Marengo et al (2010) in the δ Cep system, and infrared excess has been identified by Barmby et al (2011) in several Cepheids, the nature of the envelope of RS Pup appears fundamentally different, both in extension and total mass. Another consequence is that the dusty nebula is not a good candidate to resolve a possible evolutionary vs. pulsational mass discrepancy for RS Pup (see e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of δ Cep was extensively discussed in Marengo et al (2010b). From IRAS observations, Deasy (1988) also detected IR excesses and estimated mass-loss rate ranging from 10 −10 to 10 −6 M yr −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the formation of carbon grains in the vicinity of these stars is highly unprobable. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) detected around some Cepheids by Spitzer/IRAC and MIPS have an interstellar origin and result from a density enhancement at the interface between the wind and the interstellar medium that leads to a bow shock (Marengo et al 2010b). It is noteworthy that no signature of PAHs is observed in the MIDI spectrum or the MIDI visibilities (see Figs.…”
Section: Visibility and Spectral Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%