2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb9f6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An information theory model for optimizing quantitative magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions

Abstract: I thank my wife, Julika Kaplan, for her constant love and encouragement. She is an inspiration and an unrelenting force of good. I thank my mother, Melanie Mitchell, who has always been first in supporting me through every difficulty and every success in my life. I thank my father, Randall Mitchell. I aspire to be as genuine and kind as he always was. I thank my both of my parents for enabling me to freely pursue my academic interests throughout my life and for encouraging my curiousity always. I thank my brot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(234 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the problem structure is used to accelerate computations and facilitate tractable numerical integration. Following 45 , Gauss-Hermite quadrature is applied in each dimension of mutual information integrals defined in ( 16 ) to numerically integrate multi-variate Gaussian random variables. Quadrature order is increased until convergence is observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the problem structure is used to accelerate computations and facilitate tractable numerical integration. Following 45 , Gauss-Hermite quadrature is applied in each dimension of mutual information integrals defined in ( 16 ) to numerically integrate multi-variate Gaussian random variables. Quadrature order is increased until convergence is observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 Since motion is less of a concern in the brain, optimization methods may be applied to the sequence without constraints on delay timings. 84 Since voxel sizes are small, the 3D parameter maps and synthetic images may be reformatted into multiple planes, and their geometry are also more ideal for cortical thickness measurements. 79 By using a deep learning approach, 3D MR angiograms have also been synthesized from the data without the aid of any additional sequences, 85 potentially offering another type of synthetic image contrast (Figure 7).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the 2D technique, 3D‐QALAS is being explored for pediatric imaging, brain cancer, 80 and multiple sclerosis, 83 and is compatible with the previously developed tissue classification and myelin model in the SyMRI software 83 . Since motion is less of a concern in the brain, optimization methods may be applied to the sequence without constraints on delay timings 84 . Since voxel sizes are small, the 3D parameter maps and synthetic images may be reformatted into multiple planes, and their geometry are also more ideal for cortical thickness measurements 79 .…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many promising multiparametric mapping techniques have been proposed, 8–13 only few have demonstrated compatibility across vendors or provided reproducible values across MRI systems from different manufacturers. One cross‐vendor multiparametric technique is three‐dimensional quantification using an interleaved Look–Locker acquisition sequence with a T2 preparation pulse (3D‐QALAS), allowing for rapid eD T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density (PD) mapping of the brain 26–28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cross-vendor multiparametric technique is three-dimensional quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with a T2 preparation pulse (3D-QALAS), allowing for rapid eD T1 and T2 relaxation times and proton density (PD) mapping of the brain. [26][27][28] Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a vendor-agnostic, whole-brain, multiparametric mapping scheme based on 3D-QALAS. First, we evaluated the linearity and bias 29 of this technique using a standardized MRI system phantom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%