2003
DOI: 10.1177/00219894030383006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Infinite Question: The Paradox of Representation in Life & Times of Michael K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marais (2001) notices a fundamental ambiguity exists which points out the ethical importance of literature. Conversely, Monson (2003) asserts that the paradox of representation cannot be read simply as the final word on the novel's ethics. Multiple values involved in the novel are explored by scholars.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marais (2001) notices a fundamental ambiguity exists which points out the ethical importance of literature. Conversely, Monson (2003) asserts that the paradox of representation cannot be read simply as the final word on the novel's ethics. Multiple values involved in the novel are explored by scholars.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, with reference to the thought of Emmanuel Levinas and Maurice Blanchot, Marais suggests that Life & Times of Michael K connects the writer's concerns with the limitations of language as a means of representation and an ethics of responsibility. Tamlyn Monson's (2003) insightful essay on Coetzee pushes the Levinasian reading of Life & Times of Michael K further by emphasizing the discontinuities between the radical ethics of Levinas and Blanchot and the position of Coetzee as a writer in the global literary marketplace:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%