An inference procedure for behavioural studies combining numerical simulations, statistics and experimental results

Abstract

The technical difficulties of performing underwater observation mean that marine ecologists have long relied on behavioural experiments to study reactions of marine organisms. In this article, we examine the underlying complexity of assumptions made in raceway experiments and we propose a statistical inference procedure tailored to this type of experimental protocol. As an example, experiments were performed to test if light of two different intensities affects the proximal behaviour (i.e. direct, local and immediate) of two species of crustaceans, the hermit crab (Pagurus bernhardus), and the green crab (Carcinus maenas). Individuals were collected in the vicinity of the Sven Loven Marine Center in Tjarnö (Sweden). Their movements in raceways were recorded and the statistical distance between the resulting experimental distribution and a simulated null distribution was used to compare their behaviour in two situations: dim (when they were expected to feed) and bright light (when they were expected to shelter). Initial tests indicated no differences of behaviour between dim and bright light for the two species. However, when compared with the reference state (here, a null distribution) the behaviour in dim light deviates significantly from the null distribution suggesting non-random behaviour. Our results suggest that efforts should be made to understand the behaviours of the individuals of these two species to establish a comprehensive reference state as a basis for comparison. This fundamental information should be a prerequisite before implementing experiments testing how potential disturbances affect individual organisms in behavioural ecology.

Acoustic behaviour of male European lobsters (Homarus gammarus) during agonistic encounters

“…As our experiments were necessarily brief to avoid injury (15 min long; Scrivener, 1971) and each experiment was also unique, the carapace vibration sequences did not meet the criteria for classical statistical tests (Guarini et al, 2019). Because the development of a behavioural model was beyond the scope of the present work, we only considered whether the sequences of carapace vibrations recorded by the accelerometers on each individual during the agonistic encounters could not have been produced by a random process.…”