1953
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-8-1-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Infective Factor Controlling Sex Compatibility in Bacterium coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are insufficient to determine the relative order of xylose and mannitol. This is in partial agreement with the order given by Clowes & Rowley (1954) and in agreement with Cavalli-Sforza & Jinks (1956).…”
Section: The Efect Of F On the Transfer Of Unselected Marlcerssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These data are insufficient to determine the relative order of xylose and mannitol. This is in partial agreement with the order given by Clowes & Rowley (1954) and in agreement with Cavalli-Sforza & Jinks (1956).…”
Section: The Efect Of F On the Transfer Of Unselected Marlcerssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These h+ mutants were probably not due to a mixture of suppressor-and true back-mutations (Witkin & Kennedy, 1951) because Lieb (1951) showed, by studying nineteen randomly isolated h+ reversions of independent origin, that their rates of mutation to the h-state were the same and averaged 1.2 x lO-e/bacterium/generation. Although mutability is an extremely sensitive test, a critical decision cannot be made since, despite repeated attempts to introduce F+ factor (Cavalli, Lederberg & Lederberg, 1953) into strain 15, sexual crosses have been unsuccessful.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was later shown that the donor character, called F (for fertility), could be transferred to recipient cells independently of the usual genetic markers and with an efficiency of the order of 100% (Lederberg, Cavalli & Lederberg, 1952;Cavalli, Lederberg & Lederberg, 1953 ;Hayes, 1953a). Crosses between recipient (F -) strains were sterile; crosses between donor (F + ) and recipient strains showed maximum fertility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two donor mutants were independently isolated from strain 58-161 F + which were about 1000 times more productive in crosses with the same F-strain (Cavalli, 1950;Hayes, 19533). These mutants, which were unable to convert F -cells to the F + state, were called Hfr (high frequency of recombination).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%