2003
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2003.tb00333.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Inexpensive DME-Aided Dead Reckoning Navigator

Abstract: This paper evaluates the design and performance of an aided dead reckoning navigator for general aviation applications. The system evaluated fuses the navigation information derived from an inexpensive dead reckoning system with infrequent range measurements from distance measuring equipment transponders. The dead reckoning system is mechanized using sensors that are becoming part of the standard avionics suite in newer general aviation aircraft. Simulation studies and flight test results are discussed. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both terms cover a range of technologies from cheap but inaccurate microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) systems that operate by measuring vibrations to optical system that operate by measuring the Coriolis effect on a circular light tunnel. 1,4 As pointed out by Gebre-Egziabher, 4 a single error model is unlikely to be equally accurate across all such types of devices, and a simple error model is unlikely to be effective in long-term simulations. In particular, the model we use here does not account for factors like Schuler oscillations, cross-axis sensitivity, calibration errors, and a host of other factors.…”
Section: Imu Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both terms cover a range of technologies from cheap but inaccurate microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) systems that operate by measuring vibrations to optical system that operate by measuring the Coriolis effect on a circular light tunnel. 1,4 As pointed out by Gebre-Egziabher, 4 a single error model is unlikely to be equally accurate across all such types of devices, and a simple error model is unlikely to be effective in long-term simulations. In particular, the model we use here does not account for factors like Schuler oscillations, cross-axis sensitivity, calibration errors, and a host of other factors.…”
Section: Imu Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 is reproduced from Gebre-Egziabher. 4 It is worth noting that the slopes are not unique, and thus differing noise sources cannot always be distinguished purely on the basis of Allan variance.…”
Section: Imu Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias is a constant offset from the nominal sensor signal statistics, while drift is a time-varying offset from the nominal statistics of the sensor signal, and scaling factor is a factor scaling the signal value where the waveform itself does not change. 16 These errors are generally categorized into two categories: deterministic errors and stochastic errors. Constant biases and scaling factors are in deterministic group which are called calibration errors, while drifts are stochastic errors which can be modeled by a Gauss–Markov process with an additive wide-band noise.…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are augmented to motion state parameters and estimated through state estimation methods, however; calibration parameters are estimated using parameter estimation methods in a separate estimation module. 17–19 In this article, it is concentrated on calibration errors and the readers are referenced to Gebre-Egziabher, 16 Sadeghzadeh-Nokhodberiz et al, 19 and Flenniken et al 20 to find fault detection approaches for other sources of errors. Considering calibration parameters in the measurement, the accelerometer measurement model is formulated as follows…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important factor affecting INS performance is the accuracy of local gravity information. A popular model (Titterton and Weston, 2004) (Gebre-Egziahber, 2001) constituting of the deflections of vertical (DOV) and vertical gravity anomaly is used in this work and the error analysis is shown as:where δ h is the vertical position error, δξ and δη are the DOV errors in north-south and east-west directions respectively. g 0 and R 0 are the nominal values of local gravity and the earth's radius.…”
Section: Individual Gps and Ins System Error Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%