2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al (2015) proposed a chance-constrained two-stage fractional regional energy model (CTFO-REM) for British Columbia regional energy system planning under stochastic uncertainties, in order to minimize the system cost of per unit renewable energy utilization. Furthermore, an inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model (ITF-ESP) was devised in 2018 to address dual-objective energy system planning problems under interval featured uncertainties (Song et al, 2018). Both CTFO-REM and ITF-ESP models are practical methods to deal with conflicting issues (e.g., renewable energy utilization and system cost), however, the CTFO-REM cannot address interval uncertainties in input parameters, and the ITF-ESP was unable to analyze management schemes under different constraint-violation risk levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2015) proposed a chance-constrained two-stage fractional regional energy model (CTFO-REM) for British Columbia regional energy system planning under stochastic uncertainties, in order to minimize the system cost of per unit renewable energy utilization. Furthermore, an inexact two-stage fractional energy systems planning model (ITF-ESP) was devised in 2018 to address dual-objective energy system planning problems under interval featured uncertainties (Song et al, 2018). Both CTFO-REM and ITF-ESP models are practical methods to deal with conflicting issues (e.g., renewable energy utilization and system cost), however, the CTFO-REM cannot address interval uncertainties in input parameters, and the ITF-ESP was unable to analyze management schemes under different constraint-violation risk levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abido (2006) proposed several algorithms for solving multiple objective electric dispatch problem. Linear fractional programming (LFP) have been proposed to deal with two objectives in a programming problem (Cui et al, 2015;Song et al, 2018). Based on the LFP method, various advanced technologies, and methods are integrated to address complex uncertainties in the programming model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of studies have been conducted to help decision makers to translate the sustainable development concept into operational management plans [11][12][13][14]. Mathematical programming, as one of the most useful tools that evaluate the competition scheme between sectors such as agriculture, industry and energy for limited natural resources, receives a continued interest from water, energy and environmental practitioners [15][16][17][18][19]. Mathematical programming has its particular advantages in providing a simplified and effective way for approaching the management problem of interest and in obtaining optimal solutions that reflect the tradeoffs between conflicting interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%