2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0748-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inexact stochastic optimization model for agricultural irrigation management with a case study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there is a stream of works dealing with waste management under uncertainty where the uncertain LP problem is solved through its reformulation as an LSIO problem. This approach is compared with the interval linear optimization one in [105], [110], [111], [114], [134], [147] (a paper on water resources management), whose authors conclude that the LSIO approach has the following advantages: (i) It re ‡ects better the association of the total system revenue with gas and power prices; (ii) it generates more reliable solutions with a lower risk of system failure due to the possible constraints violation; and (iii) it provides a more ‡exible management strategy since the capital availability can be adjusted with the variations in gas prices. An integer LSIO model has been proposed in [196] for planning municipal energy systems.…”
Section: Robust Linear and Convex Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, there is a stream of works dealing with waste management under uncertainty where the uncertain LP problem is solved through its reformulation as an LSIO problem. This approach is compared with the interval linear optimization one in [105], [110], [111], [114], [134], [147] (a paper on water resources management), whose authors conclude that the LSIO approach has the following advantages: (i) It re ‡ects better the association of the total system revenue with gas and power prices; (ii) it generates more reliable solutions with a lower risk of system failure due to the possible constraints violation; and (iii) it provides a more ‡exible management strategy since the capital availability can be adjusted with the variations in gas prices. An integer LSIO model has been proposed in [196] for planning municipal energy systems.…”
Section: Robust Linear and Convex Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected applications of LSIO to di¤erent …elds can be found in [3], [4], [19], [20], [21], [49], [56], [69], [115], [117], [119], [120], [134], [140], [159], [164], [168], [180], [179], [191], [192] and [196].…”
Section: -Other Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, a significant number of optimization techniques were developed for dealing with environmental management problems, including stochastic mathematical programming (SMP), fuzzy mathematical programming (FMP) and interval mathematical programming (IMP), as well as their integrations (Macchiato et al 1994;Teng and Tzeng 1994;Lejano et al 1997;Liu et al 2003;Zhu et al 2009;Cao et al 2010;Qin et al 2010;Xu et al 2010a;Fan et al 2012;Hu et al 2012;lv et al 2012;Xu et al 2012;Li et al 2014). For example, Liu et al (2003) developed a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic robust programming method for regional air quality management where the random and fuzzy variables are tackled by stochastic chance-constrained programming and fuzzy robust programming, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible application of simulation in conjunction with linear programming is shown to maximize the nutrient contents of compost manure prepared using pig dung, buffalo dung, green manure and concentrated super phosphate in (Minh, Ranamukhaarachchi & Jayasuriya, 2007). Simulation and linear programming are also applied in soil erosion control (Segarra, Kramer & Taylor, 1985), irrigation management (Li, Lu, He and Shi, 2014) and urban water management (Zhu, Marques & Lund, 2005), working schedule planning (Matsui, Inoue, Matsushita, Yamada, Yamamoto & Sumigama, 2005), organic farming risk management (Lauwers, Decock, Dewit & Wauters, 2010), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%