2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-015-0928-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inexact restoration approach to optimization problems with multiobjective constraints under weighted-sum scalarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next algorithm is essentially the "Flexible Inexact Restoration Algorithm with Sharp Lagrangian" introduced in [9], with the particular choices of Algorithm 3.1 for the restoration procedure and for the computation of the optimization direction. The only difference between the algorithm proposed in [9] and the algorithm below is that in the line search of the latter one we ask for a sufficient decrease of the Lagrangian instead of the simple decrease required in [9].…”
Section: Global Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The next algorithm is essentially the "Flexible Inexact Restoration Algorithm with Sharp Lagrangian" introduced in [9], with the particular choices of Algorithm 3.1 for the restoration procedure and for the computation of the optimization direction. The only difference between the algorithm proposed in [9] and the algorithm below is that in the line search of the latter one we ask for a sufficient decrease of the Lagrangian instead of the simple decrease required in [9].…”
Section: Global Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference between the algorithm proposed in [9] and the algorithm below is that in the line search of the latter one we ask for a sufficient decrease of the Lagrangian instead of the simple decrease required in [9]. Note that in [9] the algorithm was introduced with the specific purpose of minimizing an objective functions with multiobjective constraints. Given a penalty parameter θ ∈ [0, 1], we consider, for all x ∈ Ω and λ ∈ IR m , the merit function [28] given by Φ(x, λ, θ) = θL(x, λ)…”
Section: Global Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations