2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-015-0730-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Inertial Tseng’s Type Proximal Algorithm for Nonsmooth and Nonconvex Optimization Problems

Abstract: We investigate the convergence of a forward-backward-forward proximal-type algorithm with inertial and memory effects when minimizing the sum of a nonsmooth function with a smooth one in the absence of convexity. The convergence is obtained provided an appropriate regularization of the objective satisfies the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz inequality, which is for instance fulfilled for semi-algebraic functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one was often used in the context of Fejer monotonicity techniques for proving convergence results of classical algorithms for convex optimization problems or, more generally, for monotone inclusion problems (see [17]). The second one is easy to verify (see [12]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one was often used in the context of Fejer monotonicity techniques for proving convergence results of classical algorithms for convex optimization problems or, more generally, for monotone inclusion problems (see [17]). The second one is easy to verify (see [12]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main feature of the inertial proximal algorithm is that the next iterate is defined by using the last two iterates. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in algorithms with inertial effect; see [312]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…piiq Comparing the assumptions in (iii) and (iv) to the ones in [9], one can notice the presence of the additional condition (2.4c), which is essential in particular when proving the boundedness of the sequence of generated iterates. Notice that in iterative schemes of gradient type, proximal-gradient type or forward-backward-forward type (see [9,11,12]) the boundedness of the iterates follow by combining a descent inequality expressed in terms of the objective function with coercivity assumptions on the later. In our setting this undertaken is less simple, since the descent inequality which we obtain below is in terms of the augmented Lagrangian associated with problem (1.1).…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting iterative schemes share the feature that the next iterate is defined by means of the last two iterates, a fact which induces the inertial effect in the algorithm. Since the works [1,3], one can notice an increasing number of research efforts dedicated to algorithms of inertial type (see [1][2][3]9,[16][17][18][19][24][25][26][27][28][30][31][32]34]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%