1959
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1959.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inequality in population genetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) i j (All summations, except where otherwise indicated, are over the integers 1,2, ...,m.) V will be called the mean viability in the first generation. The two equations, together…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) i j (All summations, except where otherwise indicated, are over the integers 1,2, ...,m.) V will be called the mean viability in the first generation. The two equations, together…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the negative conclusions of this paper remain correct when fitnesses are time-dependent or in cases of selection that cannot be interpreted as viability selection. 9 This explicit result goes back at least toScheuer and Mandel (1959). They discuss all the other assumptions besides one-locus control that must hold for this result to be correct -these complications are left out here for the sake of expository simplicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…(12) The interesting matrix inequality (11) has been found or proved in [1], [14], [171, [19], [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%