2022
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inductive graph neural network model for compound–protein interaction prediction based on a homogeneous graph

Abstract: Identifying the potential compound–protein interactions (CPIs) plays an essential role in drug development. The computational approaches for CPI prediction can reduce time and costs of experimental methods and have benefited from the continuously improved graph representation learning. However, most of the network-based methods use heterogeneous graphs, which is challenging due to their complex structures and heterogeneous attributes. Therefore, in this work, we transformed the compound–protein heterogeneous g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the applicability of existing proteochemometric methods is still limited to relatively well-studied regions of the protein space, enriched with ligandable proteins for which a substantial amount of experimental data is available. In practice, the performance of proteochemometric methods may vary depending on protein families, with a bias toward protein families that are already considered to be ligandable . Extrapolation to genuinely novel targets, belonging to unliganded regions of the sequence space, is a major challenge for current supervised AI/ML methods.…”
Section: Empowering Ligand Discovery With Proteomics and Ai/mlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the applicability of existing proteochemometric methods is still limited to relatively well-studied regions of the protein space, enriched with ligandable proteins for which a substantial amount of experimental data is available. In practice, the performance of proteochemometric methods may vary depending on protein families, with a bias toward protein families that are already considered to be ligandable . Extrapolation to genuinely novel targets, belonging to unliganded regions of the sequence space, is a major challenge for current supervised AI/ML methods.…”
Section: Empowering Ligand Discovery With Proteomics and Ai/mlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the performance of proteochemometric methods may vary depending on protein families, with a bias toward protein families that are already considered to be ligandable. 120 Extrapolation to genuinely novel targets, belonging to unliganded regions of the sequence space, is a major challenge for current supervised AI/ML methods. In this line, passing chemoproteomics data through these models may increase their domain of applicability, 121 since these high-throughput assays are likely to introduce new evidence for unseen targets and target families.…”
Section: Empowering Ligand Discovery Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work proposes a new computational approach called CPI-IGAE for predicting compound−protein interactions (CPIs) in drug development. 243 The approach transforms a compound−protein heterogeneous graph into a homogeneous graph and uses an Inductive Graph AggrEgator (IGAE)-based framework to learn low-dimensional representations of compounds and proteins in an end-to-end manner. 243 The results show that CPI-IGAE outperforms some state-of-theart methods, and the model architecture and feature extraction process are advantageous, as validated by an ablation study and visualization of embeddings.…”
Section: Gnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…243 The approach transforms a compound−protein heterogeneous graph into a homogeneous graph and uses an Inductive Graph AggrEgator (IGAE)-based framework to learn low-dimensional representations of compounds and proteins in an end-to-end manner. 243 The results show that CPI-IGAE outperforms some state-of-theart methods, and the model architecture and feature extraction process are advantageous, as validated by an ablation study and visualization of embeddings. Some of the top-ranked CPIs predicted by CPI-IGAE have been validated by recent literature reviews.…”
Section: Gnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation