2015
DOI: 10.3390/s151229850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indoor Continuous Positioning Algorithm on the Move by Fusing Sensors and Wi-Fi on Smartphones

Abstract: Wi-Fi indoor positioning algorithms experience large positioning error and low stability when continuously positioning terminals that are on the move. This paper proposes a novel indoor continuous positioning algorithm that is on the move, fusing sensors and Wi-Fi on smartphones. The main innovative points include an improved Wi-Fi positioning algorithm and a novel positioning fusion algorithm named the Trust Chain Positioning Fusion (TCPF) algorithm. The improved Wi-Fi positioning algorithm was designed based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a supplementary approach must be adopted to achieve a robust and precise indoor positioning and tracking system. For example, the authors of [28,44,45,47,129,130,131,132,133,134,135] combined PDR with other approaches to improve localization accuracy (e.g., GPS, ultrasound ranging, active RFID, WiFi signatures, and Chirp Spread Spectrum (CSS) radio beacons). The accuracy of these approaches can be greatly improved compared with stand-alone PDR systems, with errors reaching below 1.7 m. Hence, in this review, a scheme fusing a PDR system with a magnetic indoor positioning technique is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a supplementary approach must be adopted to achieve a robust and precise indoor positioning and tracking system. For example, the authors of [28,44,45,47,129,130,131,132,133,134,135] combined PDR with other approaches to improve localization accuracy (e.g., GPS, ultrasound ranging, active RFID, WiFi signatures, and Chirp Spread Spectrum (CSS) radio beacons). The accuracy of these approaches can be greatly improved compared with stand-alone PDR systems, with errors reaching below 1.7 m. Hence, in this review, a scheme fusing a PDR system with a magnetic indoor positioning technique is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where PL (dBm) is the path loss at a distance d in meters versus an increase in the distance from the transmitter in meter; Pl o is the power received at a reference distance 0 in 1 m [48]; k is a path loss index, which relies on particular propagation environment, and its value is large under impedance (i.e., obstacles and wall) [15]; and σ is a zero-mean Gaussian random variable (in decibels).…”
Section: Log-normal Shadowing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the variation of Wi-Fi RSS, computation cost involved in fingerprint matching, and utilization of the low-cost inertial sensors built-in smartphones, the refresh rate model of the Wi-Fi signal is introduced in [21] to optimize the Wi-Fi localization, and meanwhile the affinity propagation clustering is discussed in [22] to reduce the computation cost for the positioning. At the same time, an empirical model constructed from the individual height and peak-to-peak magnitude of the acceleration in each step is developed in [23] to estimate the stride length of the pedestrian.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%