2003
DOI: 10.1177/0022022103256478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indirect Self-Enhancement in Relationship among Japanese

Abstract: Past research in cross-cultural psychology has emphasized a contrast between Western self-serving tendency and East Asian self-effacing tendency in attributions. The present author, however, poses a question to this simple dichotomy and presents some empirical evidence for indirect self-enhancement among Japanese. Participants were asked to recall their positive and negative life events and to make attributions. Results showed that Japanese tended to make self-effacing attributions for their success and failur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early comparative research gave little support to the presence of a self-serving bias in Asian samples (e.g. As can be observed in the 2003 special issue of the Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, the hypotheses have examined the importance of modesty versus the centrality of others to account for these differences (Kurman, 2003), variations in bias as a function of public and private conditions (Kudo & Numazaki, 2003) and direct and indirect means of expression (Muramoto, 2003). These findings were complemented by discussions that contrasted self-enhancement biases found in Western societies and self-effacement (or modesty) biases in East Asian cultures (Markus & Kitayama, 1991).…”
Section: Indigenization From Withoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early comparative research gave little support to the presence of a self-serving bias in Asian samples (e.g. As can be observed in the 2003 special issue of the Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, the hypotheses have examined the importance of modesty versus the centrality of others to account for these differences (Kurman, 2003), variations in bias as a function of public and private conditions (Kudo & Numazaki, 2003) and direct and indirect means of expression (Muramoto, 2003). These findings were complemented by discussions that contrasted self-enhancement biases found in Western societies and self-effacement (or modesty) biases in East Asian cultures (Markus & Kitayama, 1991).…”
Section: Indigenization From Withoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in sharp contrast to the attributions found in individualistic cultures where there is an emphasis on executing personal control and standing out from the group, and where success is more likely to be attributed to inner dispositions and failures to external factors (cf. Muramoto, 2003;Weisz et al, 1984). Thus, as noted by Bond, Leung, and Wan (1982), social perceptions in collectivist cultures often suggest that "other factors external to the actor will operate to determine his or her outcomes" (p. 197).…”
Section: Cultural Universals and The Exchange Of Social Support Resoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"), while expecting others to make internal attributions for their successes (e.g., "My friend would say 'you must have studied hard' or 'you are a smart person.'") (Muramoto, 2003;Muramoto & Yamaguchi, 1997). However, no cross-cultural experiments have been designed to directly test for the effects of communicating success with friends on selfesteem change in relationships.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Self-evaluation Research In a Relationship Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study builds on previous work that has considered self-evaluation in a relational context (Dalsky, Gohm, Noguchi, & Shiomura, 2008;Kitayama & Uchida, 2003;Kobayashi & Greenwald, 2003;Muramoto, 2003;Muramoto & Yamaguchi, 1997). It involves a cross-cultural experiment in which two friends were not engaged in competition to test for cultural differences in the effects of positive feedback on selfesteem.…”
Section: Overview and Predictions Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation