2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An indirect comparison meta-analysis of AS03 and MF59 adjuvants in pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MF59 emulsion has been used in human in uenza vaccines for 2 decades, and extensive data show that it has a stronger protective effect than adjuvant-free in uenza vaccines and it increases the breadth and duration of the immune response in people of different ages [15,16] . However, serum protection against drifting viruses was as low as 20% in older subjects, which fails to meet the serum protection criteria set by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MF59 emulsion has been used in human in uenza vaccines for 2 decades, and extensive data show that it has a stronger protective effect than adjuvant-free in uenza vaccines and it increases the breadth and duration of the immune response in people of different ages [15,16] . However, serum protection against drifting viruses was as low as 20% in older subjects, which fails to meet the serum protection criteria set by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aluminium containing vaccines were associated with an increased risk of local events compared to unadjuvanted vaccines (26) (Supplementary Table 3). In adults, the risk of local adverse events after vaccination with oil-in water adjuvant containing vaccines (AS03 or MF59) was higher compared to vaccination with unadjuvanted vaccines (25,26). The increased risk was significantly higher for AS03 adjuvanted vaccines compared to MF59 adjuvanted vaccines, RR = 2.90 (95% CI 2.37-3.54) for AS03 and RR = 1.70 (95% CI 1.25-2.31) for MF59, subgroup difference p< 0.004 (25).…”
Section: Short-term Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three systematic reviews on short-term adverse events were included (25,26,33). These reviews included only RCTs.…”
Section: Short-term Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hauser reported a possible increase in local adverse events with MF59 adjuvanted vaccines in children but had no information on AS03 adjuvanted pandemic vaccine. The Hauser review (25) was assessed to high quality, the Manzoli review (26) to moderate and the Stassijns review (33) to low quality (Table 2).…”
Section: Short-term Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%