An index of floodplain surface complexity

Abstract

Abstract. Floodplain surface topography is an important component of floodplain ecosystems. It is the primary physical template upon which ecosystem processes are acted out, and complexity in this template can contribute to the high biodiversity and productivity of floodplain ecosystems. There has been a limited appreciation of floodplain surface complexity because of the traditional focus on temporal variability in floodplains as well as limitations to quantifying spatial complexity. An index of floodplain surface complexity (FSC) is developed in this paper and applied to eight floodplains from different geographic settings. The index is based on two key indicators of complexity, variability in surface geometry (VSG) and the spatial organisation of surface conditions (SPO), and was determined at three sampling scales. FSC, VSG, and SPO varied between the eight floodplains and these differences depended upon sampling scale. Relationships between these measures of spatial complexity and seven geomorphological and hydrological drivers were investigated. There was a significant decline in all complexity measures with increasing floodplain width, which was explained by either a power, logarithmic, or exponential function. There was an initial rapid decline in surface complexity as floodplain width increased from 1.5 to 5 km, followed by little change in floodplains wider than 10 km. VSG also increased significantly with increasing sediment yield. No significant relationships were determined between any of the four hydrological variables and floodplain surface complexity.

Ecosystem Responses to Water Resource Developments in a Large Dryland River

“…Ecosystem‐wide responses to multiple stressors in large floodplain rivers remain poorly understood (Tockner & Stanford, ). This is because of the inherent spatial heterogeneity (Scown et al, ) and temporal variability (Walker et al, ) of their hydrogeomorphology, governing processes, and ecological character. The enhanced complexity of large floodplain‐river ecosystems—where complexity is a function of spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability—challenges the construction of theoretical and applied models for these systems.…”

Integrated analysis of flow, form, and function for river management and design testing

“…Next, this approach incorporates subreach‐scale (<10 channel widths frequency) topographic variability because many hydrogeomorphic processes of ecological significance depend on specific patterns of topographic variability and associated habitat heterogeneity (MacWilliams, Wheaton, Pasternack, Street, & Kitanidis, ; Poff & Ward, ; Scown, Thoms, & De Jager, ). The local bankfull width at each location x i along the channel, w BF ( x i ), is given by Equation as a function of reach‐averaged bankfull width w BF and a variability control function f ( x i ), with a similar equation used to characterize vertical bed undulation that incorporates S : …”

Interactive effects of hydrogeomorphology on fish community structure in a large floodplain river

“…Various components of the flow regime are responsible in shaping the geomorphological character of riverine landscapes (Schumm ), especially its physical heterogeneity (Scown et al. ). The geomorphological character of a riverine landscape is hierarchical, operating across multiple spatial and temporal scales (Thoms and Parsons , Thorp et al.…”

“…, Dembkowski and Miranda , Scown et al. ). A limited number of studies have shown the influence of both hydrology and geomorphology on community composition (e.g., Hoeinghaus et al.…”