2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An index for cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between the GDP per capita and the average ICT activity of the areas (administrative units) is lower than 0.3. Other authors found a correlation of approximately 0.9 at the cross-country level (Hanafizadeh, Saghaei & Hanafizadeh, 2009) and approximately 0.7 at the regional level . The correlation between the employment share in agriculture and the average ICT activity was approximately zero, and we do not report it in table B.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The correlation between the GDP per capita and the average ICT activity of the areas (administrative units) is lower than 0.3. Other authors found a correlation of approximately 0.9 at the cross-country level (Hanafizadeh, Saghaei & Hanafizadeh, 2009) and approximately 0.7 at the regional level . The correlation between the employment share in agriculture and the average ICT activity was approximately zero, and we do not report it in table B.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Additionally, auto-correlation between indicators is another issue that could jeopardise model reliability. In some respect, the selection of data is based partly upon intuition and partly on subjective judgement, a situation not uncommon when building a decision support model [5,32]. A carefully designed indicator selection procedure of the model helps in making the model more concise and cost effective by avoiding unnecessary data collection costs.…”
Section: The Silent Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Components are assigned weights with the proportion of variances in the original set of indicators, and can then be aggregated using an additional or a functional nature. Weightings are used to correct the information overlap of correlated indicators, so as to ensure that the results are not biased [32]. The weighting methodology carries a value-dependent bias and, in some cases, weighting with linear aggregation causes substitution among indicators.…”
Section: Indexing Base Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main argument of their study was that a parametric index approach may be preferable to non-parametric indices. Hanafizadeh, Saghaei, and Hanafizadeh (2009) argued that the most important factor for measuring and analyzing the divide between countries is ICT infrastructure and access; thus, they devised an index for the cross-country analysis of ICT infrastructure and access. They compared their results with well-known indices such as the DAI, the DOI, and the NRI.…”
Section: Analytical Support For Benchmarking the Digital Divide Acrosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other studies concerning alternatives for globally recommended indices, which resulted in additional index-based rankings (such as Emrouznejad et al, 2010;Hanafizadeh et al, 2009), ELECTRE MLO is the only alternative approach that deeply addresses the comparability between countries and reveals corresponding BMs. The question is what makes this method a "decent" alternative to commonly used CIs approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Implications and The Added Value Of The Electre Mlomentioning
confidence: 99%