2011 International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aisp.2011.5960991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An incremental spam detection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training instances for each classifier are obtained from an iteratively updated distribution. The main difference between these two algorithms is on the distribution update rule [25]. In RotBoost, the updating rule is based on the performance of the previous classifier [22], whereas, the updating rule of RotBoost algorithm is based on the performance of the entire ensemble, which means the focus of this algorithm is on the samples containing new knowledge.…”
Section: The Proposed Incremental Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training instances for each classifier are obtained from an iteratively updated distribution. The main difference between these two algorithms is on the distribution update rule [25]. In RotBoost, the updating rule is based on the performance of the previous classifier [22], whereas, the updating rule of RotBoost algorithm is based on the performance of the entire ensemble, which means the focus of this algorithm is on the samples containing new knowledge.…”
Section: The Proposed Incremental Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%