1985
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(85)91208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An increase in putative voltage dependent calcium channel number following reserpine treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this, our results indicate that reserpine treatment increases the sensitivity of the aorta to an exogenous activator of the calcium channel. It has also been shown that reserpine treatment increases the number of calcium channels in rat seminal vesicles [26], An increase in the number of calcium chan nels of the rabbit aorta could also account for the increase in responsiveness to BAY K 8644 seen after reserpine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consistent with this, our results indicate that reserpine treatment increases the sensitivity of the aorta to an exogenous activator of the calcium channel. It has also been shown that reserpine treatment increases the number of calcium channels in rat seminal vesicles [26], An increase in the number of calcium chan nels of the rabbit aorta could also account for the increase in responsiveness to BAY K 8644 seen after reserpine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The contractions of the vas deferens and seminal vesicle in response to norepinephrine were potently inhibited by the dihydropyridine‐calcium channel blockers, nifedipine and (S)‐(+)‐niguldipine, indicating the participation of calcium influx through L‐type calcium channels in the contractions resulting from α 1 ‐AR activation. In fact, electrophysiological and radioligand binding assays have shown the presence of L‐type calcium channels in the smooth muscle cells from rat and human vas deferens and seminal vesicle [16,23–28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%