An inactivated poliovirus vaccine using Sabin strains produced on the serum-free PER.C6® cell culture platform is immunogenic and safe in a non-human primate model
Abstract:BackgroundThe World Health Organization recommends the development of affordable next-generation inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) using attenuated poliovirus Sabin strains. Previously, we introduced a novel PER.C6® cell culture platform, which allows for high yield production of an affordable trivalent Sabin IPV vaccine.MethodsImmunogenicity and safety of this novel PER.C6®-based Sabin-IPV (sIPV) was assessed in rats and non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs received one of four different dose dilutions vaccine… Show more
“…23 The IPV evaluated here is based on the safer-tomanufacture Sabin poliovirus strains and the PER.C6® platform. This platform supports a high productivity of polioviruses, [27][28][29] which showed immunogenicity in preclinical models. 29 We describe here the first clinical assessment of the PER.C6® sIPV in adult volunteers.…”
This first-in-human study (NCT03032588), conducted in Belgium, evaluated a new inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) candidate based on Sabin poliovirus strains grown on the high-yield PER.C6® cell line. Healthy adults (N = 32) were randomized (1:1) to receive a single dose of PER.C6-based Sabin-IPV (sIPV, 15:35:112.5 DU/dose) or conventional Salk-IPV (cIPV, 40:8:32 DU/dose). Reactogenicity was assessed up to 7 days after vaccination, immunogenicity 28 days after vaccination, and safety up to 6 months after vaccination.
Solicited adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate, no changes of concern in vital signs or safety laboratory values were observed, and no severe AEs (SAEs) or vaccine-related unsolicited AEs were reported after vaccination. A trend to more frequent solicited AEs after sIPV than after cIPV administration was observed. Most participants had preexisting neutralizing antibodies against poliovirus types (titer ≥8), which were strongly boosted by sIPV. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers were high (≥12,000) and similar across the two vaccination groups. Only participants with very high preexisting antibody levels did not show a vaccine-induced response, defined in seropositive participants as a 4-fold titer increase. The 10 initially seronegative (titer <8) participants (n = 5 in each study group) seroconverted and all participants had seroprotective antibody levels post-vaccination. The antibodies elicited by sIPV neutralized both Sabin and Salk poliovirus strains.
In conclusion, the PER.C6®-based sIPV was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in adults with preexisting antibodies to poliovirus.
“…23 The IPV evaluated here is based on the safer-tomanufacture Sabin poliovirus strains and the PER.C6® platform. This platform supports a high productivity of polioviruses, [27][28][29] which showed immunogenicity in preclinical models. 29 We describe here the first clinical assessment of the PER.C6® sIPV in adult volunteers.…”
This first-in-human study (NCT03032588), conducted in Belgium, evaluated a new inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV) candidate based on Sabin poliovirus strains grown on the high-yield PER.C6® cell line. Healthy adults (N = 32) were randomized (1:1) to receive a single dose of PER.C6-based Sabin-IPV (sIPV, 15:35:112.5 DU/dose) or conventional Salk-IPV (cIPV, 40:8:32 DU/dose). Reactogenicity was assessed up to 7 days after vaccination, immunogenicity 28 days after vaccination, and safety up to 6 months after vaccination.
Solicited adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate, no changes of concern in vital signs or safety laboratory values were observed, and no severe AEs (SAEs) or vaccine-related unsolicited AEs were reported after vaccination. A trend to more frequent solicited AEs after sIPV than after cIPV administration was observed. Most participants had preexisting neutralizing antibodies against poliovirus types (titer ≥8), which were strongly boosted by sIPV. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers were high (≥12,000) and similar across the two vaccination groups. Only participants with very high preexisting antibody levels did not show a vaccine-induced response, defined in seropositive participants as a 4-fold titer increase. The 10 initially seronegative (titer <8) participants (n = 5 in each study group) seroconverted and all participants had seroprotective antibody levels post-vaccination. The antibodies elicited by sIPV neutralized both Sabin and Salk poliovirus strains.
In conclusion, the PER.C6®-based sIPV was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in adults with preexisting antibodies to poliovirus.
“…Substitution of Sabin strains or the new candidate OPV strains for IPV strains in a new inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) to provide safe, affordable next-generation inactivated poliovirus vaccines is another alternative that is currently being explored [80,82,248,251,[253][254][255]. Chumakov et al [82] suggested four possible solutions to the problem of lower stability and immunogenicity of Sabin OPV strains when inactivated to be used for IPV: (1) increase antigen content to a level that would ensure adequate seroconversion (disadvantages: it requires growing greater quantities of virus made more difficult since yields of Sabin strains are lower than wildtype viruses; increases costs); (2) stimulate immunogenicity with adjuvants; (3) explore use of alternative inactivating agents that do not damage antigens as much as formaldehyde; and (4) make IPV from new, genetically stable, nonpathogenic, hyperattenuated engineered poliovirus strains with antigenic structures identical to the currently used wild-type strains [34,256].…”
Section: Poliovirus Infections At the Level Of The Individual Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in antigenic structure of inactivated polio vaccines made from Sabin live attenuated and wild-type poliovirus strains effected equivalency of vaccine potency assays used to measure the D-antigen content of the vaccines [255]. This required development of new international standard, IS 12/104, for sIPV [80,81].…”
Section: Future Directions: the Endgame Stage Of Eradication And Sustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Strictly spoken, the D-antigen unit represents two entities (antigenic content and immunogenic content) which are equivalent for WT-IPV but are different for Sabin-IPV" in [71]. Differences between results for D-antigen content for IPV strains and for OPV strains used in preparing IPV (sIPV) required that a new international standard be formulated [71,[80][81][82]. It is good to keep in mind the observation by Salk et al [83] that "the essential factor in the preparation of such a [polio] vaccine is the inclusion of a sufficient mass of the immunizing antigen, for each of the three antigenic types of poliovirus, to induce the formation of humoral antibody and/or immunologic memory after the first dose.…”
AFP Acute flaccid paralysis. AFP surveillance Characterization of enteroviruses in stool samples from all AFP cases especially in individuals under 15 years of age to rule in or rule out etiology by polioviruses. AFR or AFRO The African Health Region of the WHO. AGG A PID with agammaglobulinemia. AMR or AMRO The American Health Region of the WHO. aVDPV A vaccine-derived poliovirus isolate whose evolutionary path is unknown or ambiguous. bOPV Bivalent oral polio vaccine (containing serotypes 1 and 3). BSL Biosafety standard level. CAG Containment Advisory Group. C-antigens Refers to the epitopes after poliovirus interacts with CD155 host cell receptor and transitions into a 135S particle. Capsid The protein shell that surrounds a virus particle. Capsomere One of the individual morphological units that makes up the viral capsid. It contains a single copy of viral capsid proteins VP1, VP| 2, VP3, and VP4. CAV Coxsackie A virus. CCID 50 The cell culture infectious dose of a virus that will cause cell death in 50% of replicate cell cultures. CDC US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CD155 or PVr The human encoded cell receptor for poliovirus, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. cDNA Complimentary DNA (DNA synthesized from RNA by a reverse transcriptase enzyme). CNS Central nervous system. Codon A sequence of three adjacent nucleotides on a strand of DNA or RNA that specifies which specific amino acid will be incorporated into a protein. Codon bias Unequal usage of synonymous codons (different codons that specify the same amino acid). CPE Cytopathic effect. CRE Cis-acting replication element. CVID Common variable immune deficiencya type of primary immune deficiency cVDPV A circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus, that is, a poliovirus that has evolved from vaccine during person-to-person transmission. D-antigens Refers to epitopes on native 150S virions. Lester M. Shulman has retired.
“…Finally, Optimization of the vaccine manufacturing process via the usage of less infectious virus strains became a priority to allow IPV production in middle- and low-income countries due to the unacceptable biosafety risks accompanied with conventional IPV production. IPV developed from live-attenuated Sabin strains (sIPV) was a reasonable alternative and many studies proved its efficacy and affordability [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. In 2012, manufacturers in Japan and China were licensed for production and marketing of Sabin-IPV and this vaccine is used there extensively.…”
After years of global collaboration; we are steps away from a polio-free world. However, the currently conventional inactivated polio vaccine (cIPV) is suboptimal for the post eradication era. cIPV production cost and biosafety hazards hinder its availability and coverage of the global demands. Production of IPV from the attenuated Sabin strains (sIPV) was an ideal solution and scientists work extensively to perfect a safe, effective and affordable sIPV. This study investigated the ability of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ascorbic acid (AA) and epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) as alternatives for Formaldehyde (HCHO) to inactivate Sabin-polioviruses strains for sIPV production. Sabin-polioviruses vaccine strains were individually treated with AA, EGCG or H2O2 and were compared to HCHO. This was investigated by determination of the inactivation kinetics on HEP2C cells, testing of D-antigen preservation by ELISA and the immune response in Wistar rats of the four vaccine preparations. H2O2, AA and EGCG were able to inactivate polioviruses within 24 h while HCHO required 96 h. Significant high D-antigen levels were observed using AA, EGCG and H2O2 compared to HCHO. Rat sera tested for neutralizing antibodies showed comparable results. These findings support the idea of using these inactivating agents as safe and time- saving alternatives for HCHO to produce sIPV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.