1996
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro microleakage study of three restorative techniques for Class II restorations in posterior teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…methylene blue or silver nitrate solutions) leakage through the dentin-restorative materials interface using light, scanning electron (SEM) or transmission electron (TEM) microscopy [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Silver staining provides sharp SEM pictures of penetration at tooth-restoration margins [33] and leakage patterns have been detected [31,32] even in apparent gap-free margins of the dentin-restoration interface, obtained using the 'total-etch' technique [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…methylene blue or silver nitrate solutions) leakage through the dentin-restorative materials interface using light, scanning electron (SEM) or transmission electron (TEM) microscopy [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Silver staining provides sharp SEM pictures of penetration at tooth-restoration margins [33] and leakage patterns have been detected [31,32] even in apparent gap-free margins of the dentin-restoration interface, obtained using the 'total-etch' technique [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…properties of the composite and adhesive materials, cavity geometry, layering techniques, thermal and mechanical loading, etc. [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Factors That Affect Interfacial Debondingmentioning
confidence: 99%